Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;larssten, post: 3651559, member: 78319&quot;][ATTACH=full]980997[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=full]980998[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=full]981000[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=full]981001[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=full]981002[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=full]981003[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=full]981004[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=full]981005[/ATTACH] [ATTACH]980997[/ATTACH] [ATTACH]980998[/ATTACH] [ATTACH]981000[/ATTACH] [ATTACH]981001[/ATTACH] [ATTACH]981002[/ATTACH] [ATTACH]981003[/ATTACH] [ATTACH]981004[/ATTACH] [ATTACH]981005[/ATTACH] Hi all,</p><p><br /></p><p>Read in Bowers Guide Book to Morgan Dollars that the 1891 is often seen with a weak strike and overall unattractive surfaces and that nice MS-specimens are often hard to find.</p><p><br /></p><p>I have had a perhaps XF 1891 which I thought was well struck. Then I care over this very nice, probably MS 1891 that I want to upgrade with. Looking at it in more detail, it looks a little off to me. Or is it just that it’s actually really weakly struck like Bowers describes? Legend is weak, tip of wings seems weak and eagles breast too.</p><p><br /></p><p>See photos and let me hear your comments Photos for both the MS and the XF coin is included[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in