Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;dougsmit, post: 3045306, member: 19463&quot;]There are some of us who refuse to use the term &#039;Fallen Horseman&#039;.&nbsp; You might argue that te FH2 seated type shows completion but the others show the fall inprogress making the term &#039;Falling&#039; more appropriate.&nbsp; There was a time that we pointed fingers and corrected such things but lately there seems to be more important ways to satisfy our needs to argue so we don&#039;t bother anymore.&nbsp; &nbsp; Kent used Falling in his volume VIII of RIC and also with Carson and Hill in LRBC.&nbsp; Failmezger used Falling in his book on Late Roman Bronze Coins.&nbsp; Dealers I believe should know better have been inconsistent on the matter.&nbsp; I do not know who decided they were better than these guys and started the Fallen rot.&nbsp;&nbsp; I will continue to use Falling.&nbsp;&nbsp; Use what you want and don&#039;t worry about it.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in