Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;Nerva, post: 2794158, member: 87761&quot;]Consequentialism is conventionally divided into act based or rule based. That might be a helpful way of thinking about this case. Rule based would look at how best to establish a fair market for all participants, buyers and sellers. Some people have argued that sellers should wise up and realise they might not get more than the reserve and buyers might collude. That doesn&#039;t wash with me. I think sellers are entitled to expect a fair market. Assessing acts is a bit different and will see more shades of grey. But maybe assessing acts makes it easier to justify to ourselves behaviour that is especially beneficial to us. I wonder how a &#039;sellers&#039; forum&#039; rather than collectors&#039; forum would discuss the issue![/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in