Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Morality, legality and auction collusion
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="beef1020, post: 2794103, member: 24544"]I'll stick with your phrasing of the maxim, and still don't see how it resolves the issue. If everyone involved in a an auction colludes with a couple friends, you end up with something other than an auction. For example, think of the difference between an Olympic sprint bicycle race and the Tour de France. They are both bicycle races, but one is a winner take all race where everyone competes fairly. The other is a race where a couple groups of 'friends' decide to cooperate. The tour is a much different type of race. Now imagine someone who doesn't understand the rules trys to compete in the Tour...</p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>You have stretched logic past it's breaking point here in an effort to come up with an argument. While I applaud the analysis, I think the degree you torture the logic is a pretty good indication of the difficulty defending the position. One group gets a benefit, and the other group is damaged. Yet you end up with it's a tie, which literally doesn't follow, and therefore ok. The fact that the magnitude of the outcome may be small, which is not reasonable to assume, still does not get you to it's a tie.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="beef1020, post: 2794103, member: 24544"]I'll stick with your phrasing of the maxim, and still don't see how it resolves the issue. If everyone involved in a an auction colludes with a couple friends, you end up with something other than an auction. For example, think of the difference between an Olympic sprint bicycle race and the Tour de France. They are both bicycle races, but one is a winner take all race where everyone competes fairly. The other is a race where a couple groups of 'friends' decide to cooperate. The tour is a much different type of race. Now imagine someone who doesn't understand the rules trys to compete in the Tour... You have stretched logic past it's breaking point here in an effort to come up with an argument. While I applaud the analysis, I think the degree you torture the logic is a pretty good indication of the difficulty defending the position. One group gets a benefit, and the other group is damaged. Yet you end up with it's a tie, which literally doesn't follow, and therefore ok. The fact that the magnitude of the outcome may be small, which is not reasonable to assume, still does not get you to it's a tie.[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Morality, legality and auction collusion
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...