Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Mistake, Variant, or Both?
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="Roman Collector, post: 3149088, member: 75937"]I think the best way to describe this would be as a variant spelling. The Greek language during the Koine period was undergoing a linguistic shift known as <i><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iotacism" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iotacism" rel="nofollow">iotacism</a></i>, whereby a number of vowels and diphtongs converged in sound such that they all were pronounced like iota in modern Greek (EE as in feet).</p><p><br /></p><p>Since there were no dictionaries and no concept of orthography, words were spelled phonetically and I think ΔOMЄTIANOC is not necessarily an error but simply the way that particular die-engraver decided to spell it that day. It would have been pronounced the same as the "standard" spelling.</p><p><br /></p><p>Such spelling variants may be limited to a single die, allowing for identification of die-matches. I know I have a few spelling variations among my Roman provincial issues, but only one comes to mind right now -- this quasi-autonomous issue of Smyrna. The spelling variation on the reverse of my coin allowed me to identify it as a die-match to the SNG Copenhagen plate coin.</p><p><br /></p><p>[ATTACH=full]806366[/ATTACH]</p><p>Time of Commodus.</p><p>Quasi-autonomous AE 26.1 mm, 8.01 g, 5 h.</p><p>Ionia, Smyrna, Strategos Kl. Stratoneikianos, AD 182-184.</p><p>Obv: ΙЄΡΑ ϹVΝ [ΚΛΗΤΟϹ], draped bust of Senate, right.</p><p>Rev: CΤΡ•CΤΡΑΤΟΝЄΚ[ΙΑΝΟV СΜVΡΝΑΙΩΝ], Winged Nemesis of Smyrna, advancing right, plucking chiton and holding bridle.</p><p>Refs: RPC IV 278 (temp); Klose XV B a; SNG Cop. 1304.</p><p><br /></p><p>First, here's the listing in SNG Copenhagen:*</p><p><br /></p><p>[ATTACH=full]806370[/ATTACH]</p><p><font size="3">*Since the publication of SNG Copenhagen, we now know it's from the time of Commodus, not Severus, because Kl. Stratoneikianos was magistrate from AD 182-184.</font></p><p><br /></p><p>Note how the listing mentions that the first iota in CΤΡΑΤΟΝЄΙΚΙΑΝΟV (the name of the magistrate (Strategos) Kl. Stratoneikianos) is uncertain. My coin's inscription reads CΤΡΑΤΟΝЄΚ[...]. This is a spelling variation from other coins from this issuing authority such as <a href="https://www.cngcoins.com/Coin.aspx?CoinID=158708" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="https://www.cngcoins.com/Coin.aspx?CoinID=158708" rel="nofollow">this one</a>, <a href="http://rpc.ashmus.ox.ac.uk/coins/4/281/" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="http://rpc.ashmus.ox.ac.uk/coins/4/281/" rel="nofollow">this one</a>, and the <a href="http://rpc.ashmus.ox.ac.uk/coins/4/278/" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="http://rpc.ashmus.ox.ac.uk/coins/4/278/" rel="nofollow">RPC listing for my coin</a>, which all read CΤΡΑΤΟΝЄΙΚΙΑΝΟV with an iota between the Є and the Κ.</p><p><br /></p><p>Therefore, I was able to recognize that my coin was a reverse die-match to the Copenhagen plate coin, which also reads CΤΡΑΤΟΝЄΚI[...] (instead of CΤΡΑΤΟΝЄΙΚΙ[...]):</p><p><br /></p><p>[ATTACH=full]806371[/ATTACH]</p><p><br /></p><p>Which is apparent when compared side-by-side:</p><p><br /></p><p>[ATTACH=full]806372[/ATTACH][/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="Roman Collector, post: 3149088, member: 75937"]I think the best way to describe this would be as a variant spelling. The Greek language during the Koine period was undergoing a linguistic shift known as [I][URL='https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iotacism']iotacism[/URL][/I], whereby a number of vowels and diphtongs converged in sound such that they all were pronounced like iota in modern Greek (EE as in feet). Since there were no dictionaries and no concept of orthography, words were spelled phonetically and I think ΔOMЄTIANOC is not necessarily an error but simply the way that particular die-engraver decided to spell it that day. It would have been pronounced the same as the "standard" spelling. Such spelling variants may be limited to a single die, allowing for identification of die-matches. I know I have a few spelling variations among my Roman provincial issues, but only one comes to mind right now -- this quasi-autonomous issue of Smyrna. The spelling variation on the reverse of my coin allowed me to identify it as a die-match to the SNG Copenhagen plate coin. [ATTACH=full]806366[/ATTACH] Time of Commodus. Quasi-autonomous AE 26.1 mm, 8.01 g, 5 h. Ionia, Smyrna, Strategos Kl. Stratoneikianos, AD 182-184. Obv: ΙЄΡΑ ϹVΝ [ΚΛΗΤΟϹ], draped bust of Senate, right. Rev: CΤΡ•CΤΡΑΤΟΝЄΚ[ΙΑΝΟV СΜVΡΝΑΙΩΝ], Winged Nemesis of Smyrna, advancing right, plucking chiton and holding bridle. Refs: RPC IV 278 (temp); Klose XV B a; SNG Cop. 1304. First, here's the listing in SNG Copenhagen:* [ATTACH=full]806370[/ATTACH] [SIZE=3]*Since the publication of SNG Copenhagen, we now know it's from the time of Commodus, not Severus, because Kl. Stratoneikianos was magistrate from AD 182-184.[/SIZE] Note how the listing mentions that the first iota in CΤΡΑΤΟΝЄΙΚΙΑΝΟV (the name of the magistrate (Strategos) Kl. Stratoneikianos) is uncertain. My coin's inscription reads CΤΡΑΤΟΝЄΚ[...]. This is a spelling variation from other coins from this issuing authority such as [URL='https://www.cngcoins.com/Coin.aspx?CoinID=158708']this one[/URL], [URL='http://rpc.ashmus.ox.ac.uk/coins/4/281/']this one[/URL], and the [URL='http://rpc.ashmus.ox.ac.uk/coins/4/278/']RPC listing for my coin[/URL], which all read CΤΡΑΤΟΝЄΙΚΙΑΝΟV with an iota between the Є and the Κ. Therefore, I was able to recognize that my coin was a reverse die-match to the Copenhagen plate coin, which also reads CΤΡΑΤΟΝЄΚI[...] (instead of CΤΡΑΤΟΝЄΙΚΙ[...]): [ATTACH=full]806371[/ATTACH] Which is apparent when compared side-by-side: [ATTACH=full]806372[/ATTACH][/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Mistake, Variant, or Both?
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...