Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
misattributed rare Carthage AE
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="Silphium Addict, post: 24860828, member: 116882"]I received an early Christmas present yesterday.</p><p><br /></p><p>I collect Punic coins and there are not many Carthage AEs I don't have. It is not in very good condition, especially the corrosion on the obverse, but I have never seen this one offered before:</p><p>Auction image</p><p>[ATTACH=full]1594340[/ATTACH]</p><p>Carthage AE 220-205 BC 8.25 g, 22 mm, 12h</p><p>O: head Tanit left</p><p>R: horse rearing left</p><p><i>CNP</i> 148; Alexandropoulos 93</p><p><br /></p><p>It was listed as a similar appearing coin from Panormos, CNP 157. I had checked the auction when it first came online, but just thought is was not a very good example of this coin type from Panormos:</p><p>[ATTACH=full]1594342[/ATTACH]</p><p>Sicily, Panormos 300-264 BC 10. g, 22 mm</p><p>O: female head left</p><p>R: horse galloping left; sun with face and rays above</p><p><i>CNP</i> 157b</p><p><br /></p><p>When I got an email about the auction closing the next day, I decided to look through the offerings again. I realized the coin just did not look like a Panormos AE should. Punic coin reverses with horses rearing left are uncommon. I checked Viola <i>Corpus Nummorum Punicorum</i> (<i>CNP</i>). It lists Punic coins sequentially by reverse. I discovered it is actually a rare Second Punic War issue from Carthage. Then I remembered an article by Visona that discusses the coin type in "Tradition and innovation in Carthaginian coinage during the Second Punic War" <i>SNR</i> 88: 173-182, 2009 <a href="https://www.e-periodica.ch/cntmng?pid=snr-003:2009:88::348" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="https://www.e-periodica.ch/cntmng?pid=snr-003:2009:88::348" rel="nofollow">https://www.e-periodica.ch/cntmng?pid=snr-003:2009:88::348</a></p><p><br /></p><p>Previously thought to be from Punic Spain, Visona identified it as as an issue of the Carthage mint during the second Punic War because of the find locations, style and use of aligned dies. He identified 2 obverse and 5 reverse dies, but it still seems to be rare with about a dozen examples reported.</p><p><br /></p><p>So, I was fortunate to find a rare addition to my collection at the last minute.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="Silphium Addict, post: 24860828, member: 116882"]I received an early Christmas present yesterday. I collect Punic coins and there are not many Carthage AEs I don't have. It is not in very good condition, especially the corrosion on the obverse, but I have never seen this one offered before: Auction image [ATTACH=full]1594340[/ATTACH] Carthage AE 220-205 BC 8.25 g, 22 mm, 12h O: head Tanit left R: horse rearing left [I]CNP[/I] 148; Alexandropoulos 93 It was listed as a similar appearing coin from Panormos, CNP 157. I had checked the auction when it first came online, but just thought is was not a very good example of this coin type from Panormos: [ATTACH=full]1594342[/ATTACH] Sicily, Panormos 300-264 BC 10. g, 22 mm O: female head left R: horse galloping left; sun with face and rays above [I]CNP[/I] 157b When I got an email about the auction closing the next day, I decided to look through the offerings again. I realized the coin just did not look like a Panormos AE should. Punic coin reverses with horses rearing left are uncommon. I checked Viola [I]Corpus Nummorum Punicorum[/I] ([I]CNP[/I]). It lists Punic coins sequentially by reverse. I discovered it is actually a rare Second Punic War issue from Carthage. Then I remembered an article by Visona that discusses the coin type in "Tradition and innovation in Carthaginian coinage during the Second Punic War" [I]SNR[/I] 88: 173-182, 2009 [URL]https://www.e-periodica.ch/cntmng?pid=snr-003:2009:88::348[/URL] Previously thought to be from Punic Spain, Visona identified it as as an issue of the Carthage mint during the second Punic War because of the find locations, style and use of aligned dies. He identified 2 obverse and 5 reverse dies, but it still seems to be rare with about a dozen examples reported. So, I was fortunate to find a rare addition to my collection at the last minute.[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
misattributed rare Carthage AE
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...