Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;HandsomeToad, post: 523112, member: 12965&quot;]Here&#039;s a real good one:</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p><a href="http://rover.ebay.com/rover/1/711-53200-19255-0/1?type=3&amp;campid=5335874456&amp;toolid=10001&amp;mpre=http%3A%2F%2Fcgi.ebay.com%2FRARE-KEY-DATE-1798-8-7-DRAPED-BUST-LARGE-CENT-FINE-LQQK_W0QQitemZ270344854911" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="http://rover.ebay.com/rover/1/711-53200-19255-0/1?type=3&amp;campid=5335874456&amp;toolid=10001&amp;mpre=http%3A%2F%2Fcgi.ebay.com%2FRARE-KEY-DATE-1798-8-7-DRAPED-BUST-LARGE-CENT-FINE-LQQK_W0QQitemZ270344854911" rel="nofollow">http://cgi.ebay.com/RARE-KEY-DATE-1798-8-7-DRAPED-BUST-LARGE-CENT-FINE-LQQK_W0QQitemZ270344854911</a></p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>Redbook lists a 1798/7 at about 50% more than other 1798&#039;s, other than ones with a 1796 reverse and not taking into consideration the rarer varieties, so a person is more apt to want something to be the &quot;better one&quot; as is the case here, because considering all three 1798/7 varieties (S-150 thru S-152) are a 1st hairstyle and this one is a 2nd hairstyle, it doesn&#039;t take much to figure out this is NOT a 1798/7 variety. :goofer: I think it may be a S-166, since everything matches up and I can make out pieces of the major die crack of a S-166, thru the crud coating the surface. :kewl:</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>I&#039;ve messaged the seller, as always, so watch to see what they do? <img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie2" alt=";)" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" /></p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>Ribbit <img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie1" alt=":)" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" />[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in