Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Mis-attributed Roman Imperial coin
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="zumbly, post: 2053581, member: 57495"]I'm also seeing GAL VAL MAXIMIANVS NOB CAES, which would indeed make it Galerius. I can't see clearly enough on the reverse what letters you have in the centerfield, and if there's a mintmark in the exergue or it's been worn off. But if you have HA-epsilon in the center then it's RIC VI Heraclea 16, if you have only A-delta and see what's left of an ALE in the exergue then it's RIC VI Alexandria 48B.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="zumbly, post: 2053581, member: 57495"]I'm also seeing GAL VAL MAXIMIANVS NOB CAES, which would indeed make it Galerius. I can't see clearly enough on the reverse what letters you have in the centerfield, and if there's a mintmark in the exergue or it's been worn off. But if you have HA-epsilon in the center then it's RIC VI Heraclea 16, if you have only A-delta and see what's left of an ALE in the exergue then it's RIC VI Alexandria 48B.[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Mis-attributed Roman Imperial coin
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...