Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
US Coins Forum
>
Mint rolls vs uncirculated coin sets
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="cladking, post: 1255418, member: 68"]The best coins have pretty much consistently gone into mint sets since 1965 when the proof presses were shipped to San Francisco and mint set coins were struck on them. Mint set coins are struck at lower speeds with more pressure by new dies. Of course this mostly only assures that coins are high quality when they come off the dies and doesn't assure that they aren't scratched up. It also doesn't preclude the possibility that regular issue coins might not have been even better. As a rule of thumb it doesn't matter if regular issue post-'64 coins were better than mint set coins or not because almost no regular issue coins were saved and all that exist in pristine condition came from mint sets. Also keep in mind that strike characteristics aren't very important to some collectors and virtually all of some coins in mint sets can have marking. In such a case some people will prefer regular issue if they can find them. </p><p><br /></p><p>In almost every single case for coins made since 1965 the finest coins will come from mint sets. This is a little less true for Ikes and a few specific dates of other coins. Generally superb gems are simply impossible from rolls and finding them in mint sets is like shooting fish in a barrel. </p><p><br /></p><p>I heartell that quality of the '11 mint sets is dismal. It's still a safe bet the finest few hundred of each coin were all put in mint sets though even if they are tough.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="cladking, post: 1255418, member: 68"]The best coins have pretty much consistently gone into mint sets since 1965 when the proof presses were shipped to San Francisco and mint set coins were struck on them. Mint set coins are struck at lower speeds with more pressure by new dies. Of course this mostly only assures that coins are high quality when they come off the dies and doesn't assure that they aren't scratched up. It also doesn't preclude the possibility that regular issue coins might not have been even better. As a rule of thumb it doesn't matter if regular issue post-'64 coins were better than mint set coins or not because almost no regular issue coins were saved and all that exist in pristine condition came from mint sets. Also keep in mind that strike characteristics aren't very important to some collectors and virtually all of some coins in mint sets can have marking. In such a case some people will prefer regular issue if they can find them. In almost every single case for coins made since 1965 the finest coins will come from mint sets. This is a little less true for Ikes and a few specific dates of other coins. Generally superb gems are simply impossible from rolls and finding them in mint sets is like shooting fish in a barrel. I heartell that quality of the '11 mint sets is dismal. It's still a safe bet the finest few hundred of each coin were all put in mint sets though even if they are tough.[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
US Coins Forum
>
Mint rolls vs uncirculated coin sets
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...