Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;enamel7, post: 8061487, member: 18054&quot;]Yes, but the problem here is you already refuse to except the teachings that have been given you. It was well explained that a dual mint mark on the quarter is impossible. Over mint marks and rpms were only possible when said mint marks were punched into the die face by hand. After 1989 all mint marks were engraved into the master. No punching! </p><p>You sent the 1982 D out without actually knowing the difference between small and large date. </p><p>The 1969 could be a doubled die, but not the big one. Chances are it will be md.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in