Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;rhoggman, post: 394981, member: 13987&quot;]First of all <i><b>variety collecting does add something new to coin collecting, even if variety collecting itself is not new, new varieties are found often. Therefore, variety collecting is innovative</b></i> (not my opinion, Daniel Webster&#039;s).</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>You say it does not add to history...... I am not a variety collector, but <b><i>if you read about varieties it oviously adds much to history especially when it comes to operations at the various mints, and more....</i></b></p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>I share your sentiments when it comes to the lack of desire to be a variety collector; however, I was never making a case for my emotional attachment to coin varieties. <b><i>Rewards should, and do come to those who put forth directed effort, otherwise effort would be fruitless in all endevours, and therfore worthless</i></b>. </p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>I will not get into your accusations of generalities, me making absurd statements, or have ideas that are extreme hyperbole. </p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>Since you made negative comments about variety collecting, and then proved in your own words you have no idea what you are talking about I have no reason to refute your statements. </p><p>&nbsp;</p><p><b><i>Your comments that it does not add to coin collecting, is not innovative, or adds no historical narrative proves without a doubt all your arguments lack actual facts.</i></b></p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>Slimebag was the wrong thing to say... It was not my intention to put anyone down, and I see how that comment was uneeded.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in