Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;GDJMSP, post: 2973467, member: 112&quot;]Sounds to me like you are the one with the bias. If they can detect AT and recognize it as easily as you claim, then why is it they call toning &quot;questionable&quot; instead of calling it what it is ? </p><p><br /></p><p>By definition, when they say questionable, they are saying we don&#039;t know if it is or isn&#039;t, but we don&#039;t like it so we think it <u>might be</u> AT.</p><p><br /></p><p>And then of course there&#039;s all those coins that are <u>known</u> by their submitter to be NT (because of the specific circumstances) that the TPG labeled as questionable, and all those coins that were obviously AT, and capable of being recognized as AT by a 6 yr old, and yet cleanly graded and slabbed by the TPGs.</p><p><br /></p><p>All of those things combined tell me that your confidence in them is misplaced. In other words, that you are the one with the bias - not me.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in