Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Coin Chat
>
Milk Spots- Are They Such a Big Deal?
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="Colonialjohn, post: 2135368, member: 57741"]Bajjerfan - a production by-product on the surface is respectable enough. The high vacuum is required in XPS is needed so the lighter elements like chlorine and sulfur can be measured like in a SEM/EDS analysis. It really has nothing to do with how clean or dirty the surface of a coin is prior to analysis. Certain coins are polished to get a more represenative alloy under the aged patina. To measure using XPS it needs to be done in a vacuum so the lighter elements do not impart false readings on the heavier metals like silver.</p><p><br /></p><p>But remember your toned Morgan Dollar in your pic is PMD with atmospheric sulfur as described per White's Coin Chemistry book - as simple as that treatise was with this collector. Your one? XPS witness test I guess prevents you to also visualize chlorine as another atmospheric contaminant or another form of PMD.</p><p><br /></p><p>XPS is a surface chemical analysis technique that can be used to analyze the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Surface_science#Surface_chemistry" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Surface_science#Surface_chemistry" rel="nofollow">surface chemistry</a> of a material in its as-received state, or after some treatment, for example: fracturing, cutting or scraping in air or UHV to expose the bulk chemistry, <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ion_beam#Ion_beam_etching_or_sputtering" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ion_beam#Ion_beam_etching_or_sputtering" rel="nofollow">ion beam etching</a> to clean off some or all of the surface contamination (with mild ion etching) or to intentionally expose deeper layers of the sample (with more extensive ion etching) in depth-profiling XPS, exposure to heat to study the changes due to heating, exposure to reactive gases or solutions, exposure to <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ion_implantation" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ion_implantation" rel="nofollow">ion beam implant</a>, exposure to <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ultraviolet_light" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ultraviolet_light" rel="nofollow">ultraviolet light</a>.</p><p><br /></p><p>John Lorenzo</p><p>Numismatist</p><p>United States[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="Colonialjohn, post: 2135368, member: 57741"]Bajjerfan - a production by-product on the surface is respectable enough. The high vacuum is required in XPS is needed so the lighter elements like chlorine and sulfur can be measured like in a SEM/EDS analysis. It really has nothing to do with how clean or dirty the surface of a coin is prior to analysis. Certain coins are polished to get a more represenative alloy under the aged patina. To measure using XPS it needs to be done in a vacuum so the lighter elements do not impart false readings on the heavier metals like silver. But remember your toned Morgan Dollar in your pic is PMD with atmospheric sulfur as described per White's Coin Chemistry book - as simple as that treatise was with this collector. Your one? XPS witness test I guess prevents you to also visualize chlorine as another atmospheric contaminant or another form of PMD. XPS is a surface chemical analysis technique that can be used to analyze the [URL='http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Surface_science#Surface_chemistry']surface chemistry[/URL] of a material in its as-received state, or after some treatment, for example: fracturing, cutting or scraping in air or UHV to expose the bulk chemistry, [URL='http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ion_beam#Ion_beam_etching_or_sputtering']ion beam etching[/URL] to clean off some or all of the surface contamination (with mild ion etching) or to intentionally expose deeper layers of the sample (with more extensive ion etching) in depth-profiling XPS, exposure to heat to study the changes due to heating, exposure to reactive gases or solutions, exposure to [URL='http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ion_implantation']ion beam implant[/URL], exposure to [URL='http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ultraviolet_light']ultraviolet light[/URL]. John Lorenzo Numismatist United States[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Coin Chat
>
Milk Spots- Are They Such a Big Deal?
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...