Reply to Thread

Message:: [QUOTE="GDJMSP, post: 2134484, member: 112"]I didn't ask anybody to trust me Vic, I simply made a statement that what krispy posted pictures of were not milk spots. Then I was asked to prove it, but how can anybody prove that ? They can't, there is no way to "prove" it. Before he even posted his pictures I posted one, taken by another member, of what milk spots actually do look like. The spots on the coin in that picture are what the numismatic community calls milk spots. And they all have the same basic look. So what exactly is it that I am supposed to reference beyond what I did before krispy even posted his pictures ? Milk spots are identified by the way they look, and I had already posted a picture of how they look. So the so called "proof" he keeps asking for was there before he ever asked for it. If I post a picture of a horse, and krispy then posts a picture of a cow and says here's my horse, and I then say that's not a horse krispy - do I need to prove it ? Of course not, because any reasonable person who looks at krispy's picture will know it is not a horse. Why ? Because horses look entirely different than cows. It's the same thing with this. As I stated in the beginning of this idiocy milk spots have a very unique and distinct look. There is no proof beyond that, short of a chemical analysis, which is obviously not even possible. So to even ask for "proof" is nothing more than idiocy.[/QUOTE]