Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;krispy, post: 2130405, member: 19065&quot;]That&#039;s nice, but it still doesn&#039;t define what, if any, terms and conditions have to be met in order to secure the much ballyhooed reward monies from the company or the individual to suggested the reward is to be paid. </p><p><br /></p><p>They don&#039;t seem to have defined what is or what isn&#039;t a milk spot any more than people in any forum have said what is or isn&#039;t a milk spot. The grading service also hasn&#039;t laid out any official terms of what is acceptable in terms of removal and conservation that would render a coin back to market acceptable condition, even IF the marks could be remedied, or somehow lessened to improve on negative eye-appeal to eventually earn a coin the graders&#039; guarantee again. With nothing to go on, the reward offer isn&#039;t much of an incentive. The horse can say anything he wants to but he may or may not speak when we get him on stage in front of a crowd. </p><p><br /></p><p>I still ask, is there nothing officially stated? Is there no archived press-release with some set of standards by which someone looking for a solution to the problem can go by, and for that matter stands to hold the company to such a boast? Without this, all the emphatic on this issue so certain they know what is or is not a milk spot have absolutely NO platform from which to dictate to others what constitutes this condition, least of all that &#039;shape&#039; or lack thereof a certain type of mark or shape, is or isn&#039;t a milk spot.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in