Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;physics-fan3.14, post: 3613931, member: 19165&quot;]I realize I&#039;m being hard on you. Sorry if I&#039;m coming across mean - not my intention at all. If it had gotten UCAM, it totally would have been worth it.</p><p><br /></p><p>For the purpose of teaching us, can you (or somebody else?) maybe explain the differences between CAM and UCAM on SMS coins. What made you think it was UCAM, and why did it perhaps not get UCAM? This is purely for educational purposes - not to be mean or aggressive at all. You have seen the coin, NGC has seen the coin, we&#039;ve only seen the pictures. What do you think it is the difference between your expectations, NGC&#039;s standards, and the reality of the coin? This sort of harsh analysis is necessary for us to learn.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in