Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Micro-crystalline and Appearance
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="kevin McGonigal, post: 3960934, member: 72790"]There have been several posts in the past about the use of a preservative micro-crystalline product that museums use to preserve metal objects, including coins. Its use engenders debate in the numismatic community about its effects, though museums seem to like it. Whether it does actually protect coins from future ravages of time, well, I suppose we will have to wait a few centuries to see if that is so.</p><p><br /></p><p>Also, there are some who believe the use of micro-crystalline can improve the appearance of coins, giving them a smoother, glossy look. I suppose that will be up for debate as well since eye appeal is about as subjective a determination as there can be. In reading about micro-crystalline I have not found any before-and-after pictures, so I decided to take a handful of coins and apply the substance, wait a bit and gently buff the coins with a soft cloth to see if it is possible to discern any difference in appearance.</p><p><br /></p><p>What I found out is that I can see no difference at all with silver coins so I have not included their images here. I tried four low silver billon coins and included below are two of them, the Roman eastern mint Tetradrachmas, and I am not sure if there is any difference. I tried two brass pieces, both Dupondii of Vespasian, and one of the coins is pictured below. The small bronze of Commodus below may also be a brass but I am not sure. I think I may see a slight improvement in appearance there. The Sestertius of Alexander Severus and the bronze As of the same ruler do seem to me to look better as is true of the little Tetricus (or Claudius II) and the Kushan bronze from First century India and the big Follis of Justinian.</p><p><br /></p><p>What I would like readers to do is to take a look at my photos and see if there is any detectable change in the appearances of the coins from before to after the application of the micro-crystalline. Also, for those of you who may have been using this substance for a while, what is your experience with it? Thanks for any input you might have.</p><p>[ATTACH=full]1043326[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=full]1043327[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=full]1043328[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=full]1043329[/ATTACH][/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="kevin McGonigal, post: 3960934, member: 72790"]There have been several posts in the past about the use of a preservative micro-crystalline product that museums use to preserve metal objects, including coins. Its use engenders debate in the numismatic community about its effects, though museums seem to like it. Whether it does actually protect coins from future ravages of time, well, I suppose we will have to wait a few centuries to see if that is so. Also, there are some who believe the use of micro-crystalline can improve the appearance of coins, giving them a smoother, glossy look. I suppose that will be up for debate as well since eye appeal is about as subjective a determination as there can be. In reading about micro-crystalline I have not found any before-and-after pictures, so I decided to take a handful of coins and apply the substance, wait a bit and gently buff the coins with a soft cloth to see if it is possible to discern any difference in appearance. What I found out is that I can see no difference at all with silver coins so I have not included their images here. I tried four low silver billon coins and included below are two of them, the Roman eastern mint Tetradrachmas, and I am not sure if there is any difference. I tried two brass pieces, both Dupondii of Vespasian, and one of the coins is pictured below. The small bronze of Commodus below may also be a brass but I am not sure. I think I may see a slight improvement in appearance there. The Sestertius of Alexander Severus and the bronze As of the same ruler do seem to me to look better as is true of the little Tetricus (or Claudius II) and the Kushan bronze from First century India and the big Follis of Justinian. What I would like readers to do is to take a look at my photos and see if there is any detectable change in the appearances of the coins from before to after the application of the micro-crystalline. Also, for those of you who may have been using this substance for a while, what is your experience with it? Thanks for any input you might have. [ATTACH=full]1043326[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=full]1043327[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=full]1043328[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=full]1043329[/ATTACH][/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Micro-crystalline and Appearance
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...