Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;medoraman, post: 1605665, member: 26302&quot;]Yeah, but in ancients you go from old references to new, from European spelling to US conventions, have alphabets like Sassanid with no vowels so you are only guessing anyway, it all makes for a slight mess spelling wise. I am just saying it helps to be &quot;open&quot; to spelling idiosynchrasies and be able to reconcile who they heck they are talking about. <img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie1" alt=":)" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" /></p><p><br /></p><p>Heck, there are even differences between numismatists and academics. The book &quot;Persepolis to the Punjab&quot; has it Vahran, yet the &quot;Decline and Fall of the Sassanid Empire&quot; has it Bahram. Both are newish publications. So which is &quot;right&quot;?[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in