Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Metals and Alloys of the Ancients
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="kaparthy, post: 3666344, member: 57463"]In a different topic, this came up.</p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>We should discuss this because Latin has no word for "zinc." The metals of the ancients were gold, silver, mercury, copper, iron, tin, and lead. I agree that we identify orichalcum that way in our time. I am not sure how they perceived it.</p><p><br /></p><p>It bears also on our beliefs about "electrum" or "white gold." Tin, for example, while called "stannous" in Latin, is also called "plumbnum album" or "white lead" in some texts. Lacking an atomic theory of matter the ancients did not perceive metals as we do today. Electrum was considered a separate metal, even though it could be made from silver and gold. Silver and gold were recognized in astrology, for example, as being identified with the moon and sun, but no celestial body is identified with electrum. </p><p><br /></p><p>So, too, with bronze on the one hand and orichalcum on the other, are distinctions perhaps not theirs. Copper was identified with the planet Venus - Aphrodite having been born on or near Cyprus - but no "bronze planet" exists. </p><p><br /></p><p>I agree that we make these distinctions among metals and their alloys. I am not sure whether, how, or why they did. Among the many cultural disconnects is that by academic publications going back to the Renaissance, we have a long tradition of intellectual hegemony. The ancient world did not.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="kaparthy, post: 3666344, member: 57463"]In a different topic, this came up. We should discuss this because Latin has no word for "zinc." The metals of the ancients were gold, silver, mercury, copper, iron, tin, and lead. I agree that we identify orichalcum that way in our time. I am not sure how they perceived it. It bears also on our beliefs about "electrum" or "white gold." Tin, for example, while called "stannous" in Latin, is also called "plumbnum album" or "white lead" in some texts. Lacking an atomic theory of matter the ancients did not perceive metals as we do today. Electrum was considered a separate metal, even though it could be made from silver and gold. Silver and gold were recognized in astrology, for example, as being identified with the moon and sun, but no celestial body is identified with electrum. So, too, with bronze on the one hand and orichalcum on the other, are distinctions perhaps not theirs. Copper was identified with the planet Venus - Aphrodite having been born on or near Cyprus - but no "bronze planet" exists. I agree that we make these distinctions among metals and their alloys. I am not sure whether, how, or why they did. Among the many cultural disconnects is that by academic publications going back to the Renaissance, we have a long tradition of intellectual hegemony. The ancient world did not.[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Metals and Alloys of the Ancients
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...