Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;physics-fan3.14, post: 6825252, member: 19165&quot;]See, this is why the so-called &quot;Cherry-pickers&quot; is not the most useful book.... it supposedly lists the &quot;most valuable&quot; or &quot;desirable&quot; varieties, but in no-way ever claims to be a complete reference. It is incredibly incomplete. I&#039;d never use it to try to identify anything, and I&#039;d never recommend anyone spend money on it. It just isn&#039;t worth it.</p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>In my opinion, this coin absolutely does not match RPM-002. The separation south on this coin is not as far, and RPM-002 does not show the distinct north separation on the tail (RPM-002 shows more separation on the bottom loop). I&#039;d describe this as an S/S/S triple Repunched mintmark, and in my opinion it looks like a new discovery.</p><p><br /></p><p>Submit it to James Wiles at Coneca for credit, because this looks like a legit new triple RPM.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in