Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Medieval - Some Thoughts on the Normans and their Coins
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="FitzNigel, post: 3330943, member: 74712"]I think the problem of dating your coin to 1000-1200AD is that we don’t have evidence of gold being in use as coins in Western Europe (none that I am aware of anyway - aside from areas of Islamic influence such as Spain and Southern Italy). there is certainly the concept, as I recall an entry in one of the Pipe rolls of Henry II (although it may have been Richard I or John - this is an old memory) mentioning paying with a gold shilling. Shillings were just an accounting term at that time, so supposedly the fee was paid with some type of gold, but no evidence that it was coin.</p><p><br /></p><p>You said you brought your coin to Pol who said it was a Tremissis - why would you doubt him? Again, I have no experience with these coins, but they are generally a mystery. So why do you think 1000-1200?</p><p>While the design looks like geometric shapes, it doesn’t share the same characteristics as the Norman types (the arrows are strange - the pellet in the square could work, but the Norman coins have pellets inside triangles), and the Norman coins were so terribly debased that I doubt they would bother minting something in gold.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="FitzNigel, post: 3330943, member: 74712"]I think the problem of dating your coin to 1000-1200AD is that we don’t have evidence of gold being in use as coins in Western Europe (none that I am aware of anyway - aside from areas of Islamic influence such as Spain and Southern Italy). there is certainly the concept, as I recall an entry in one of the Pipe rolls of Henry II (although it may have been Richard I or John - this is an old memory) mentioning paying with a gold shilling. Shillings were just an accounting term at that time, so supposedly the fee was paid with some type of gold, but no evidence that it was coin. You said you brought your coin to Pol who said it was a Tremissis - why would you doubt him? Again, I have no experience with these coins, but they are generally a mystery. So why do you think 1000-1200? While the design looks like geometric shapes, it doesn’t share the same characteristics as the Norman types (the arrows are strange - the pellet in the square could work, but the Norman coins have pellets inside triangles), and the Norman coins were so terribly debased that I doubt they would bother minting something in gold.[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Medieval - Some Thoughts on the Normans and their Coins
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...