Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Medieval Monday!
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="Severus Alexander, post: 8234938, member: 84744"]Interesting thought! You may be right! </p><p><br /></p><p>As far as the overall design goes, [USER=110504]@+VGO.DVCKS[/USER]'s thought is right that it derives from earlier (heavier) folles from Antioch. It's a design that persists for a while. Here's a Tancred coin, 3.35g (1101-1112):</p><p>[ATTACH=full]1448469[/ATTACH] </p><p>(Looking at my coin's reverse, upside down again, makes me wonder if it doesn't have that crossed T that we see in the 4 o'clock quadrant on the above coin?)</p><p>[ATTACH=full]1448470[/ATTACH] </p><p><br /></p><p>Maybe worn versions of the Tancred coins were still circulating in Antioch a century and a half later, but illegible and so hard to copy? (Most that you see are pretty hard to read.) </p><p><br /></p><p>Here's another interesting comparison, <a href="https://www.acsearch.info/search.html?id=7452590" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="https://www.acsearch.info/search.html?id=7452590" rel="nofollow">a coin minted by the Armenian king Levon I</a> early in the 13th century in preparation for a takeover of Antioch which never happened. These coins were meant for circulation in the conquered city:</p><p>[ATTACH=full]1448471[/ATTACH] </p><p><br /></p><p>The Tancred design ultimately derives from Byzantine anonymous folles. <a href="https://www.acsearch.info/search.html?id=8909244" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="https://www.acsearch.info/search.html?id=8909244" rel="nofollow">Here's a heavy imitation</a> (4.43g) that probably circulated in the area. Note the eight-sided flan, which is typical of the late Antioch folles:</p><p>[ATTACH=full]1448472[/ATTACH] </p><p>And another, lighter (1.68g) imitation, possibly 13th century and close to my coin's weight standard:</p><p>[ATTACH=full]1448474[/ATTACH] </p><p><br /></p><p>And finally, <a href="https://www.acsearch.info/search.html?id=8419291" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="https://www.acsearch.info/search.html?id=8419291" rel="nofollow">here's another issue from Antioch</a> from around the same time as mine, this time with Arabic on the obverse, reading "fals Antak" (still considered a crusader issue, though I'm not sure why it couldn't be a post-sack coin):</p><p>[ATTACH=full]1448476[/ATTACH] </p><p><br /></p><p>Anyway, lots to think about, and a fun series![/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="Severus Alexander, post: 8234938, member: 84744"]Interesting thought! You may be right! As far as the overall design goes, [USER=110504]@+VGO.DVCKS[/USER]'s thought is right that it derives from earlier (heavier) folles from Antioch. It's a design that persists for a while. Here's a Tancred coin, 3.35g (1101-1112): [ATTACH=full]1448469[/ATTACH] (Looking at my coin's reverse, upside down again, makes me wonder if it doesn't have that crossed T that we see in the 4 o'clock quadrant on the above coin?) [ATTACH=full]1448470[/ATTACH] Maybe worn versions of the Tancred coins were still circulating in Antioch a century and a half later, but illegible and so hard to copy? (Most that you see are pretty hard to read.) Here's another interesting comparison, [URL='https://www.acsearch.info/search.html?id=7452590']a coin minted by the Armenian king Levon I[/URL] early in the 13th century in preparation for a takeover of Antioch which never happened. These coins were meant for circulation in the conquered city: [ATTACH=full]1448471[/ATTACH] The Tancred design ultimately derives from Byzantine anonymous folles. [URL='https://www.acsearch.info/search.html?id=8909244']Here's a heavy imitation[/URL] (4.43g) that probably circulated in the area. Note the eight-sided flan, which is typical of the late Antioch folles: [ATTACH=full]1448472[/ATTACH] And another, lighter (1.68g) imitation, possibly 13th century and close to my coin's weight standard: [ATTACH=full]1448474[/ATTACH] And finally, [URL='https://www.acsearch.info/search.html?id=8419291']here's another issue from Antioch[/URL] from around the same time as mine, this time with Arabic on the obverse, reading "fals Antak" (still considered a crusader issue, though I'm not sure why it couldn't be a post-sack coin): [ATTACH=full]1448476[/ATTACH] Anyway, lots to think about, and a fun series![/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Medieval Monday!
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...