Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;seth77, post: 7887166, member: 56653&quot;]Poey d&#039;Avant&#039;s work has the great advantage of being a general catalog of feudal coinages and this is why it is still used as a reference today. Regarding the interpretations of the coinages, Poey has almost none and where it does bring some comments they are rather lacunary and outdated. It is better than Boudeau -- which is normal considering that Boudeau just marks the available numismatic material from the auctions of the time. </p><p><br /></p><p>An example is the coinage of Chartres, which goes from the grand denier of 1000 to the 12th century issues and then back to the grand deniers etc, in a rather random progression. The same with Chateaudun 11th century coinage, that&#039;s a complete Durcheinander by Poey&#039;s.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in