Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;+VGO.DVCKS, post: 6407660, member: 110504&quot;]A&nbsp; self-quotation from last Wednesday, in this thread:</p><p><a href="https://www.cointalk.com/threads/androgynous-ancients-beautiful-is-beautiful-so-whats-changed-in-the-last-2-500-years-my-1st-musa.374965/page-2#post-6334624" class="internalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="https://www.cointalk.com/threads/androgynous-ancients-beautiful-is-beautiful-so-whats-changed-in-the-last-2-500-years-my-1st-musa.374965/page-2#post-6334624">https://www.cointalk.com/threads/androgynous-ancients-beautiful-is-beautiful-so-whats-changed-in-the-last-2-500-years-my-1st-musa.374965/page-2#post-6334624</a> :</p><p>&quot;Now I&#039;m seriously interested in getting some idea of what <i>is</i> extant in primary literature for Elagabalus. And Roman historiography more generally. If Classical sources were as prone to bias as medieval ones were, it&#039;s like, Yikes; swiftly followed by, Condolences. ...Just, Dang, welcome to the club.&quot;</p><p>Of course, medieval historians have long supplemented, and inexorably revised, chronicles with legal documents.&nbsp; As I&#039;m generous enough to acknowledge that you are aware (--don&#039;t thank me!), it&#039;s only recently that this has has expanded to numismatic and other archaeological evidence.&nbsp; I&#039;ve been watching the steady&nbsp; increase of interdisciplinary approaches within the discipline over the last couple of decades, not only with approval, but excitement.</p><p>Thanks for noting that Sanders is in academia.edu.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in