Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;The Penny Lady®, post: 637651, member: 16948&quot;]</p><p><br /></p><p>I too am very sorry this thread got off course and absolutely was not Doug-bashing, just suggesting Doug-softening as Mike said, but I/we said my/our piece on that, and Doug said his, so I think that is all that needs to be said.</p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>Labels such as this are unnecessary, uncalled for, and inappropriate.&nbsp;&nbsp; </p><p><br /></p><p>Mike says this very well, and I completely agree - however it came across, I was trying to be constructive, not critical - again, enough said.</p><p><br /></p><p>I also agree with Illini that the analogy with MPL&#039;s being compared to the housing market is completely disconnected.&nbsp; There will never be more MPL&#039;s, only less.&nbsp; They were made for such a short period of time (1909-1916), in such a unique manner (matte surface), and are so amazingly detailed for any proof (every hair and curl and dimple stand out like they were 3-D) that, to me, they are gems to be treasured and revered.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in