Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Coin Chat
>
Market grading: the true story...
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="NPCoin, post: 1206374, member: 5629"]Market grading is as old as the lay numismatic hobbyist. James Halprin (in his <i>N.C.I. Grading Guide</i>) defines market grading as "the grade at which most reputable dealers would retail a coin. Often the retail market grade is less conservative than the technical grade. Factors other than the state of preservation are taken into account..." What I find interesting is the allusion that the practice of market grading originates with those selling the coins...the dealers. That would mean that "market grading" is as old as the practice of coin dealing itself.</p><p><br /></p><p>To very partially answer your question as to who is involved in this market grading push, here are some of the people from some of the most prominent entities involved:</p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>If we go as far back as the late 1940s, we come across Dr. Sheldon form whom the current 70-point system of grading used in the ANA standards was derived. Although Sheldon's scale varies from the form of "market grading" we have today, it is still similar in that there is a direct grade-price correlation. It is said that the ANA, as early as 1908, had a grading committee with attempts to set standards for particular series. Whether these attempts were attempts to indoctrinate a form of "market grading" on the numismatic community would only be revealed by the copies of "<i>The Numismatist</i>" from 1908-1911 (which I do not have in my library) with the Gettys-Catich articles referred to in Halprin's <i>N.C.I. Grading Guide</i>.</p><p><br /></p><p>Even if these earlier attempts at standardization do not meet up with the definition of the term "market grade", the attempts were most certainly accelerated in the early 1970s when the "invasion of the investors" was foreseen by many in the numismatic industry. The modern practice of "market grading" could well be attributed to this "invasion" as dollar signs danced in the heads of those with inventory. Just something to really think about.</p><p><br /></p><p>Regardless, I would contend that "market grading" has existed since the beginnings of numismatic transactions. When applied to formal standards, we call it "market grading". When applied to informal dealings, we have historically called it "over-grading" or "trying to rip-off the unlearned".[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="NPCoin, post: 1206374, member: 5629"]Market grading is as old as the lay numismatic hobbyist. James Halprin (in his [I]N.C.I. Grading Guide[/I]) defines market grading as "the grade at which most reputable dealers would retail a coin. Often the retail market grade is less conservative than the technical grade. Factors other than the state of preservation are taken into account..." What I find interesting is the allusion that the practice of market grading originates with those selling the coins...the dealers. That would mean that "market grading" is as old as the practice of coin dealing itself. To very partially answer your question as to who is involved in this market grading push, here are some of the people from some of the most prominent entities involved: If we go as far back as the late 1940s, we come across Dr. Sheldon form whom the current 70-point system of grading used in the ANA standards was derived. Although Sheldon's scale varies from the form of "market grading" we have today, it is still similar in that there is a direct grade-price correlation. It is said that the ANA, as early as 1908, had a grading committee with attempts to set standards for particular series. Whether these attempts were attempts to indoctrinate a form of "market grading" on the numismatic community would only be revealed by the copies of "[I]The Numismatist[/I]" from 1908-1911 (which I do not have in my library) with the Gettys-Catich articles referred to in Halprin's [I]N.C.I. Grading Guide[/I]. Even if these earlier attempts at standardization do not meet up with the definition of the term "market grade", the attempts were most certainly accelerated in the early 1970s when the "invasion of the investors" was foreseen by many in the numismatic industry. The modern practice of "market grading" could well be attributed to this "invasion" as dollar signs danced in the heads of those with inventory. Just something to really think about. Regardless, I would contend that "market grading" has existed since the beginnings of numismatic transactions. When applied to formal standards, we call it "market grading". When applied to informal dealings, we have historically called it "over-grading" or "trying to rip-off the unlearned".[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Coin Chat
>
Market grading: the true story...
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...