Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;messydesk, post: 2487441, member: 1765&quot;]This looks like something I&#039;ve called VAM 36A LDS.&nbsp; VAM 36 is also appropriate and actually might be preferred, since there isn&#039;t a pre-clash VAM 36 that would cause ambiguity.&nbsp; The E clash is only present on the early stages of this die marriage, as the reverse came from VAM 22A.</p><p><br /></p><p>As for the planchet impurity, leave it alone.&nbsp; If a grader sees this, it&#039;s sort of a signal to look for signs of attempting to remove it in a non-market-acceptable manner.&nbsp; It affects eye appeal, so if this coin were a shot-65 without it, it would not be graded 65 with it.&nbsp; At the 62 vs. 63 level, however, this shouldn&#039;t affect the grade given the size and location.</p><p><br /></p><p>This die marriage is one of the more common E-reverse VAMs, and can be found without a huge amount of effort with and without the E.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in