Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;dougsmit, post: 5227016, member: 19463&quot;]My first thought here would question if you know a particularly strongly struck example of the type without VIC GER that certainly proves that all of the type did not have those elusive letters in the die but that they might only transfer of a fraction of coins and worn away quickly.&nbsp; That leaves a question as to whether we must have two listings in a catalog for coins that &#039;become&#039; a different type from what their die was.&nbsp; In some catalogs, we see a statement to the effect, &quot;Some dies show an inscription on the shield.&quot;&nbsp; Experts will never agree on how to handle such matters.&nbsp; Assuming what is not seen can be dangerous.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in