Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Marcus Aemilius Lepidus; AIMILIA REF S•C M•LEPIDVS
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="Marsyas Mike, post: 3237932, member: 85693"]Welcome to Coin Talk, Sulla80. I'm no expert, but the weight alone seems to put this in the unofficial category. Nice toning and style on it though. </p><p><br /></p><p>But it is puzzling. I am not sure fourrées were typically all that underweight, were they? What's the point of making a base-core copy if the low weight would be so easy to detect? The only reason I suspect the OP of being a fourree is what looks like core exposure on the obverse. </p><p><br /></p><p>In my limited experience, any Roman Republican denarius getting around 3 grams is pretty suspicious. And yet, I keep running across examples that look pretty good. </p><p><br /></p><p>For a little over a year I've been accumulating examples of my avatar (not that I <i>own</i> necessarily- just ones I find online), looking for light weight (3 grams or under) examples that aren't obvious cast fakes. I have found several examples at 3 grams or less that do not appear to be fourrée. Modern forgeries? Perhaps. I just don't know. One of the examples I found appears to be both very worn and crystalized - that could explain a low weight. But I have found several well-preserved examples that are just light. </p><p><br /></p><p>Here is a Censorinus (my avatar) that I own - it weighs just a whisper under 3 grams. I posted it back when I first joined CT and it was overwhelmingly deemed a counterfeit. People on this Forum know a lot more than I do, so I am inclined to agree. But I don't think it's fourrée and I can't figure why a modern counterfeiter would want to bother with something so off-center. There could be other answers - barbaric? The obverse style is pretty "Roman" but the reverse, including the lettering, is a bit "barbaric." It is possible it is a cast fake, but the edge clean-up was well done. The Forgery Network features several examples of fakes for this type, but none appear to be a die match for mine. </p><p><br /></p><p>[ATTACH=full]846913[/ATTACH] </p><p><br /></p><p>[ATTACH=full]846916[/ATTACH]</p><p><font size="4"><b>Roman Republic Denarius </b></font></p><p><b>Lucius Marcius Censorinus</b></p><p><b>(82 B.C.) </b></p><p>Laureate head of Apollo rt. / L CENSOR Satyr Marsyas, bearded, nude and drunk holding wineskin before column (Minerva?).</p><p>Crawford 363/1d;</p><p>Marcia 24; Sydenham 737</p><p>(2.97 g. / 18 mm)[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="Marsyas Mike, post: 3237932, member: 85693"]Welcome to Coin Talk, Sulla80. I'm no expert, but the weight alone seems to put this in the unofficial category. Nice toning and style on it though. But it is puzzling. I am not sure fourrées were typically all that underweight, were they? What's the point of making a base-core copy if the low weight would be so easy to detect? The only reason I suspect the OP of being a fourree is what looks like core exposure on the obverse. In my limited experience, any Roman Republican denarius getting around 3 grams is pretty suspicious. And yet, I keep running across examples that look pretty good. For a little over a year I've been accumulating examples of my avatar (not that I [I]own[/I] necessarily- just ones I find online), looking for light weight (3 grams or under) examples that aren't obvious cast fakes. I have found several examples at 3 grams or less that do not appear to be fourrée. Modern forgeries? Perhaps. I just don't know. One of the examples I found appears to be both very worn and crystalized - that could explain a low weight. But I have found several well-preserved examples that are just light. Here is a Censorinus (my avatar) that I own - it weighs just a whisper under 3 grams. I posted it back when I first joined CT and it was overwhelmingly deemed a counterfeit. People on this Forum know a lot more than I do, so I am inclined to agree. But I don't think it's fourrée and I can't figure why a modern counterfeiter would want to bother with something so off-center. There could be other answers - barbaric? The obverse style is pretty "Roman" but the reverse, including the lettering, is a bit "barbaric." It is possible it is a cast fake, but the edge clean-up was well done. The Forgery Network features several examples of fakes for this type, but none appear to be a die match for mine. [ATTACH=full]846913[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=full]846916[/ATTACH] [SIZE=4][B]Roman Republic Denarius [/B][/SIZE] [B]Lucius Marcius Censorinus (82 B.C.) [/B] Laureate head of Apollo rt. / L CENSOR Satyr Marsyas, bearded, nude and drunk holding wineskin before column (Minerva?). Crawford 363/1d; Marcia 24; Sydenham 737 (2.97 g. / 18 mm)[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Marcus Aemilius Lepidus; AIMILIA REF S•C M•LEPIDVS
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...