Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Managing a collection part two...in photoessay format.
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="Stork, post: 3124754, member: 71642"][USER=19463]@dougsmit[/USER] I had to think awhile on your excellent post and comments. I made up a long, long answer. But, basically it came down to what was I trying to do with my coding system. With more thought I realized I was trying to do 2 different things and mixing them up into one identifier.</p><p><br /></p><p>The shorter answer is the primary use is to give me a personal catalog number so I can locate the paperwork for each coin in an organized (!) fashion. Like what [USER=84744]@Severus Alexander[/USER] posted. For that I fell back on a multi-digit system type familiar from my military days. A two number prefix to designate one of 10 smaller categories, then using the database generated record number to sort the envelopes within the 10 categories. In my example 20 is for ancients. I'll have two digits for Japan, Albania, other World, US, medals/tokens, and whatever else strikes my fancy. </p><p><br /></p><p>I can always subdivide further to 21, 22, etc. if I ever get enough of a collection. The software makes renumbering relatively simple if it had to be done.</p><p><br /></p><p>The longer version of the answer addresses what you brought up...making the system add more information. Not needed for the simple records tracking, but for the program itself. I had added the letters to my selection not entirely sure what I would do with them, but you brought up some great options. I was going in the general direction of an identifier...but really the program sorts the coins that way already. Using the letters to ID the camera used is brilliant.</p><p><br /></p><p>My last letter is a grade of how awesome the coin is on a visceral level. A few As are expected. Bs are excellent. D is dreck. F is fail/sell. That leaves C for lesser duplicates and things to pare down. That is a separate field in the database so I can pull them up that way anytime I want. Not really needed for tracking my paperwork though. </p><p><br /></p><p>I already have the primary sorting field so far as Greek, Roman Republic, Roman Provincial, and Roman Imperial (handily provided by the tags/seller/listing for the most part). My secondary field is generally what followed on the tag--THRACE, Abdera, or Probus for example. Under the first sort, the coins will sort out that way. I can redesignate what I want as the sorting field order at any time. I'm thinking if I want to move Byzantine to the bottom I'll give it a sorting field of zByzantine. I can perhaps use those three letters I don't know exactly what to do with and use that for the sorting too.</p><p><br /></p><p>You give some very interesting food for thought though, and thankfully using this program makes instituting change a little more palatable. But the more I can figure out with 20 coins vs. 200 the better. </p><p><br /></p><p>All this is why I post--get (and hopefully give) ideas on how to make a personal system better for oneself![/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="Stork, post: 3124754, member: 71642"][USER=19463]@dougsmit[/USER] I had to think awhile on your excellent post and comments. I made up a long, long answer. But, basically it came down to what was I trying to do with my coding system. With more thought I realized I was trying to do 2 different things and mixing them up into one identifier. The shorter answer is the primary use is to give me a personal catalog number so I can locate the paperwork for each coin in an organized (!) fashion. Like what [USER=84744]@Severus Alexander[/USER] posted. For that I fell back on a multi-digit system type familiar from my military days. A two number prefix to designate one of 10 smaller categories, then using the database generated record number to sort the envelopes within the 10 categories. In my example 20 is for ancients. I'll have two digits for Japan, Albania, other World, US, medals/tokens, and whatever else strikes my fancy. I can always subdivide further to 21, 22, etc. if I ever get enough of a collection. The software makes renumbering relatively simple if it had to be done. The longer version of the answer addresses what you brought up...making the system add more information. Not needed for the simple records tracking, but for the program itself. I had added the letters to my selection not entirely sure what I would do with them, but you brought up some great options. I was going in the general direction of an identifier...but really the program sorts the coins that way already. Using the letters to ID the camera used is brilliant. My last letter is a grade of how awesome the coin is on a visceral level. A few As are expected. Bs are excellent. D is dreck. F is fail/sell. That leaves C for lesser duplicates and things to pare down. That is a separate field in the database so I can pull them up that way anytime I want. Not really needed for tracking my paperwork though. I already have the primary sorting field so far as Greek, Roman Republic, Roman Provincial, and Roman Imperial (handily provided by the tags/seller/listing for the most part). My secondary field is generally what followed on the tag--THRACE, Abdera, or Probus for example. Under the first sort, the coins will sort out that way. I can redesignate what I want as the sorting field order at any time. I'm thinking if I want to move Byzantine to the bottom I'll give it a sorting field of zByzantine. I can perhaps use those three letters I don't know exactly what to do with and use that for the sorting too. You give some very interesting food for thought though, and thankfully using this program makes instituting change a little more palatable. But the more I can figure out with 20 coins vs. 200 the better. All this is why I post--get (and hopefully give) ideas on how to make a personal system better for oneself![/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Managing a collection part two...in photoessay format.
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...