Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Malichus II of Nabataea
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="Parthicus, post: 2811182, member: 81887"]The last of my recent purchases that I hadn't posted yet:</p><p>[ATTACH=full]657861[/ATTACH] </p><p>Nabataean Kingdom. AE 17. Malichus II and Queen Shaqilath II (40-71 AD). Petra mint. Obverse: Conjoined heads of Malichus II and Shaqilath II facing right. Reverse: Crossed cornucopia, Aramaic legend between "Malichus, Shaqilath" in three lines, two lines between cornucopia and one line below (not clear on this specimen). Sear, Greek Imperial, 5703. Purchased from Ephesus Numismatics.</p><p><br /></p><p>Nabataea, as I mentioned in previous posts, was an ancient Arab kingdom covering territory roughly equivalent to modern Jordan and the Sinai Peninsula. The kingdom was quite wealthy due to its prime position along the spice trading routes, and was an ally of Rome from the first century BC until Trajan annexed the territory as the new province of Arabia Petraea in 106 AD. Not much is known about the reign of Malichus II. During the Jewish Revolt, he sent 5,000 cavalry and 1,000 infantry to support the Roman armies of Titus. Also, David Sear's Greek Imperial Coins and Their Values notes, "Shaqilath II was sister and wife of Malichus II." <img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie12" alt="o_O" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" /> I guess they picked up this habit from their Egyptian neighbors?</p><p><br /></p><p>Like most Nabataean bronzes, this features conjoined busts of both the king and queen. The portraits are rather stylized- I don't think it's possible to distinguish the various Nabataean rulers by portrait alone, the legend is key to proper attribution. Coins of Malichus II seem to be less common than those of either his predecessor Aretas IV (9 BC- 40 AD) or his successor Rabbel II (71-106 AD), though it's not obvious why as he had a long and apparently peaceful reign. Also, on this coin you can see part of a casting sprue. Like many bronze coins of the region (Judaea, Seleucids, Parthians, etc.) the planchets were originally cast in a string of blanks that were then cut apart; the remaining sprue was supposed to be sanded off prior to striking, but often there was a trace left.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="Parthicus, post: 2811182, member: 81887"]The last of my recent purchases that I hadn't posted yet: [ATTACH=full]657861[/ATTACH] Nabataean Kingdom. AE 17. Malichus II and Queen Shaqilath II (40-71 AD). Petra mint. Obverse: Conjoined heads of Malichus II and Shaqilath II facing right. Reverse: Crossed cornucopia, Aramaic legend between "Malichus, Shaqilath" in three lines, two lines between cornucopia and one line below (not clear on this specimen). Sear, Greek Imperial, 5703. Purchased from Ephesus Numismatics. Nabataea, as I mentioned in previous posts, was an ancient Arab kingdom covering territory roughly equivalent to modern Jordan and the Sinai Peninsula. The kingdom was quite wealthy due to its prime position along the spice trading routes, and was an ally of Rome from the first century BC until Trajan annexed the territory as the new province of Arabia Petraea in 106 AD. Not much is known about the reign of Malichus II. During the Jewish Revolt, he sent 5,000 cavalry and 1,000 infantry to support the Roman armies of Titus. Also, David Sear's Greek Imperial Coins and Their Values notes, "Shaqilath II was sister and wife of Malichus II." o_O I guess they picked up this habit from their Egyptian neighbors? Like most Nabataean bronzes, this features conjoined busts of both the king and queen. The portraits are rather stylized- I don't think it's possible to distinguish the various Nabataean rulers by portrait alone, the legend is key to proper attribution. Coins of Malichus II seem to be less common than those of either his predecessor Aretas IV (9 BC- 40 AD) or his successor Rabbel II (71-106 AD), though it's not obvious why as he had a long and apparently peaceful reign. Also, on this coin you can see part of a casting sprue. Like many bronze coins of the region (Judaea, Seleucids, Parthians, etc.) the planchets were originally cast in a string of blanks that were then cut apart; the remaining sprue was supposed to be sanded off prior to striking, but often there was a trace left.[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Malichus II of Nabataea
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...