Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
World Coins
>
Malichus I, AE 19
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="John Anthony, post: 1785349, member: 42773"]<font face="Times New Roman">Here’s a Nabataean bronze I reserved today. It’s not in my possession yet, but I offer you the dealer’s image, and whatever I could piece together about its history.</font></p><p> </p><p><font face="Times New Roman"><a href="http://postimage.org/" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="http://postimage.org/" rel="nofollow"><img src="http://s2.postimg.org/6inqylnk9/Malichus_I.jpg" class="bbCodeImage wysiwygImage" alt="" unselectable="on" /></a></font></p><p> </p><p><font face="Times New Roman">Dealer’s attribution (to be investigated)…</font></p><p><font face="Times New Roman">NABATAEA. Malichus I. 60-30 BC. Æ 19mm, Petra mint. Very Rare!</font></p><p><span style="color: #272727"><font face="Times New Roman">Diademed head right / Eagle standing left.</font></span></p><p><span style="color: #272727"><font face="Times New Roman">Meshorer, </font></span><i><span style="color: #272727"><font face="Times New Roman">Nabataea 15; HGC 10, 684</font></span></i></p><p> </p><p><font face="Times New Roman">The story of this coin begins with Herod the Great, who had been appointed governor of Galilee by Hyrcanus II Antipater around 42 BCE. However, two years later, Hyrcanus’s nephew, Antigonas, managed to take his uncle’s throne with the help of a few Parthians, and Herod fled to Rome. While there, he managed to convince the Roman Senate to proclaim him “King of the Jews”, which Josephus tells us occurred sometime around 40 BCE.</font></p><p> </p><p><font face="Times New Roman">Here’s a picture of Joey Bonifacio’s portrayal of Herod, just because I think he wears it well, and a map of the Hasmonean dynasty around that time.</font></p><p> </p><p><font face="Times New Roman"><a href="http://postimage.org/" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="http://postimage.org/" rel="nofollow"><img src="http://s18.postimg.org/j4np4smih/hasmonean.png" class="bbCodeImage wysiwygImage" alt="" unselectable="on" /></a></font></p><p> </p><p><font face="Times New Roman">Evidently Herod had been generous to Malichus in the past, although history doesn’t record the details, so Herod expected a little help from the Nabataean king in taking back the throne. It wasn’t forthcoming, however - at least at the start. Malichus did not want to take sides against the Parthians who had helped install Antigonas in Jerusalem. So Herod went to Egypt for help.</font></p><p> </p><p><font face="Times New Roman">In the end, Malichus did have a change of heart, and even followed after Herod, but did not catch up with him. Perhaps the Nabataean king concluded that Herod was a more important ally than the Parthians, or perhaps he just wanted to make a show of support, without actually engaging in any work (sort of like when my kids offer to help when I’m almost done with a job).</font></p><p> </p><p><font face="Times New Roman">In any case, Herod dispatched Antigonas in 37 BCE and after consolidating his position in Judaea, decided to settle the score with Malichus. The two armies met just outside Jerusalem, and the Nabataeans got trounced. Here’s a totally gratuitous and probably inaccurate picture of ancient Jews fighting ancient Arabs. (I’m pretty sure the Nabataeans weren’t idiots, and wouldn’t have gone into an archery skirmish without armor)…</font></p><p> </p><p><font face="Times New Roman"><a href="http://postimage.org/" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="http://postimage.org/" rel="nofollow"><img src="http://s23.postimg.org/eyw7c4csr/horse2.jpg" class="bbCodeImage wysiwygImage" alt="" unselectable="on" /></a></font></p><p> </p><p><font face="Times New Roman">At any rate, Malichus and his armies retreated to Cana with the Herodians in hot pursuit, but the tables were about to be turned. One of Cleopatra’s generals, Athenion, came to Malichus’s rescue and defeated Herod’s army. The remnants of the Nabataean army finished the job. From then on, Herod stuck to guerilla warfare against Malichus.</font></p><p> </p><p><font face="Times New Roman">It’s not clear to my why Athenion got mixed up in the fray, but it may have had something to do with that whole business of Marc Antony giving away chunks of Arabia to Cleopatra and her sons. Herod was eventually to become Cleopatra’s rent collector – maybe they were putting him in his place?</font></p><p> </p><p><font face="Times New Roman">THE COIN</font></p><p> </p><p><font face="Times New Roman">These coins are dated either in the 27th or 28th years of Malichus’s reign, corresponding to 34 and 33 BCE. They were emergency coins, if you will, used to pay the Nabataean army during the conflicts with Herod, and production ceased immediately thereafter. Because of the limited run, they are scarce in any condition. This one is probably a condition rarity, but I can’t say for sure because I’ve seen so few. The dealer calls it EXTREMELY RARE!!! But that’s what dealers do.</font></p><p> </p><p><font face="Times New Roman">They came in three sizes, likely corresponding to denominations – mine is the middle size. The inscription goes around the entire rim, but the left side is off the flan of my coin. It translates, “Malichus the king, king of the Nabataeans”. The date is on both sides of the eagle, 20/7. This is the first time a Nabataean inscription appears on a coin - earlier coins used Greek, or were anepigraphic.</font></p><p> </p><p>Thanks for reading another one of my interminable posts. <img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie1" alt=":)" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" />[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="John Anthony, post: 1785349, member: 42773"][FONT=Times New Roman]Here’s a Nabataean bronze I reserved today. It’s not in my possession yet, but I offer you the dealer’s image, and whatever I could piece together about its history.[/FONT] [FONT=Times New Roman][URL='http://postimage.org/'][IMG]http://s2.postimg.org/6inqylnk9/Malichus_I.jpg[/IMG][/URL][/FONT] [FONT=Times New Roman]Dealer’s attribution (to be investigated)…[/FONT] [FONT=Times New Roman]NABATAEA. Malichus I. 60-30 BC. Æ 19mm, Petra mint. Very Rare![/FONT] [COLOR=#272727][FONT=Times New Roman]Diademed head right / Eagle standing left.[/FONT][/COLOR] [COLOR=#272727][FONT=Times New Roman]Meshorer, [/FONT][/COLOR][I][COLOR=#272727][FONT=Times New Roman]Nabataea 15; HGC 10, 684[/FONT][/COLOR][/I] [FONT=Times New Roman]The story of this coin begins with Herod the Great, who had been appointed governor of Galilee by Hyrcanus II Antipater around 42 BCE. However, two years later, Hyrcanus’s nephew, Antigonas, managed to take his uncle’s throne with the help of a few Parthians, and Herod fled to Rome. While there, he managed to convince the Roman Senate to proclaim him “King of the Jews”, which Josephus tells us occurred sometime around 40 BCE.[/FONT] [FONT=Times New Roman]Here’s a picture of Joey Bonifacio’s portrayal of Herod, just because I think he wears it well, and a map of the Hasmonean dynasty around that time.[/FONT] [FONT=Times New Roman][URL='http://postimage.org/'][IMG]http://s18.postimg.org/j4np4smih/hasmonean.png[/IMG][/URL][/FONT] [FONT=Times New Roman]Evidently Herod had been generous to Malichus in the past, although history doesn’t record the details, so Herod expected a little help from the Nabataean king in taking back the throne. It wasn’t forthcoming, however - at least at the start. Malichus did not want to take sides against the Parthians who had helped install Antigonas in Jerusalem. So Herod went to Egypt for help.[/FONT] [FONT=Times New Roman]In the end, Malichus did have a change of heart, and even followed after Herod, but did not catch up with him. Perhaps the Nabataean king concluded that Herod was a more important ally than the Parthians, or perhaps he just wanted to make a show of support, without actually engaging in any work (sort of like when my kids offer to help when I’m almost done with a job).[/FONT] [FONT=Times New Roman]In any case, Herod dispatched Antigonas in 37 BCE and after consolidating his position in Judaea, decided to settle the score with Malichus. The two armies met just outside Jerusalem, and the Nabataeans got trounced. Here’s a totally gratuitous and probably inaccurate picture of ancient Jews fighting ancient Arabs. (I’m pretty sure the Nabataeans weren’t idiots, and wouldn’t have gone into an archery skirmish without armor)…[/FONT] [FONT=Times New Roman][URL='http://postimage.org/'][IMG]http://s23.postimg.org/eyw7c4csr/horse2.jpg[/IMG][/URL][/FONT] [FONT=Times New Roman]At any rate, Malichus and his armies retreated to Cana with the Herodians in hot pursuit, but the tables were about to be turned. One of Cleopatra’s generals, Athenion, came to Malichus’s rescue and defeated Herod’s army. The remnants of the Nabataean army finished the job. From then on, Herod stuck to guerilla warfare against Malichus.[/FONT] [FONT=Times New Roman]It’s not clear to my why Athenion got mixed up in the fray, but it may have had something to do with that whole business of Marc Antony giving away chunks of Arabia to Cleopatra and her sons. Herod was eventually to become Cleopatra’s rent collector – maybe they were putting him in his place?[/FONT] [FONT=Times New Roman]THE COIN[/FONT] [FONT=Times New Roman]These coins are dated either in the 27th or 28th years of Malichus’s reign, corresponding to 34 and 33 BCE. They were emergency coins, if you will, used to pay the Nabataean army during the conflicts with Herod, and production ceased immediately thereafter. Because of the limited run, they are scarce in any condition. This one is probably a condition rarity, but I can’t say for sure because I’ve seen so few. The dealer calls it EXTREMELY RARE!!! But that’s what dealers do.[/FONT] [FONT=Times New Roman]They came in three sizes, likely corresponding to denominations – mine is the middle size. The inscription goes around the entire rim, but the left side is off the flan of my coin. It translates, “Malichus the king, king of the Nabataeans”. The date is on both sides of the eagle, 20/7. This is the first time a Nabataean inscription appears on a coin - earlier coins used Greek, or were anepigraphic.[/FONT] Thanks for reading another one of my interminable posts. :)[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
World Coins
>
Malichus I, AE 19
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...