Reply to Thread

Message:: [QUOTE="Numismania, post: 1924288, member: 28971"]Jay, no need to apologize...HEALTHY disagreements are what it's all about and it's how we learn, especially when proven wrong. As for what you say, Rich S., whether the experts agree or not, it's all about how the COLLECTORS of these will receive them.  Those who say this '14 Lincoln isn't major (I being one of them), could very well be proven wrong, not by the 'experts', per se, but, ultimately, by how much Joe Q. Collector is prepared to pay up for them.  I didn't think the '09 Lincolns were 'all that', as there are what, a bajillion different ones (same thing went for the Minnesota SHQ 'extra tree'...just sooo many of them)?.  But, there ARE a few of the '09 Lincolns that have DEFINITELY proven me wrong, and those big prices are for ANACS graded/attributed coins (as they, obviously, are the only ones attributing them, presently), and we all know where ANACS coins (speaking specifically about the NEW ANACS 'yellow slabs') sit in the 'pecking order' of TPG's and realized prices.  If those coins can bring big $$'s in ANACS slabs, well, if/WHEN PCGS and NGC attribute them, all bets are off.[/QUOTE]