Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;bgarg, post: 204551, member: 1876&quot;]I understand what you mean. </p><p><br /></p><p>But the history tells us that after Aurenzab, the mughal empire was lost to local rulers and then later to British and other European traders. In 1717 when the mughal emperor Farrukhsiyar signed the treaty for &#039;East India Company&#039; to do the trade in his empire, that was the end of mughal empire. After that, every mughal monarchs was&nbsp; bounded within red-fort in Delhi and were ruling only Delhi and some surrounding areas. So&nbsp; most of the later mughal monarchs were like kings and not emperors (as they already lost the &quot;Empire of Hindostan&quot; long before)</p><p><br /></p><p>Regards</p><p>Ballabh Garg[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in