Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;Beefer518, post: 4583235, member: 87737&quot;]Thanks to everyone who participated. I&#039;m not a LWC guy, but I&#039;m also in the 10-15 range on the reverse, with 12 being (what I think) a fair compromise.</p><p><br /></p><p>Now on to the &quot;Why only the reverse?&quot; question...</p><p><br /></p><p>[USER=100526]@Razz[/USER] hit it - It&#039;s a 22 No-D, already authenticated as a Die Pair 2 Strong Reverse by ANACS. It was straight graded a VG-8. (Cherrypicked on ebay a couple of years ago)</p><p><br /></p><p>Now for the couple of years I&#039;ve owned this, while I wasn&#039;t beaming with joy over the VG-8, I was accepting of it. But just recently I was reading about the 22 No-D&#039;s, and it seems the coin is primarily graded based on the reverse, and I&#039;ve always felt the reverse was decently better then 8. With 50% of the &#039;voters&#039; at F-15, I&#039;m wondering if the coin is under-graded. There is a decent value jump just from 8 to 10, and even moreso to 12 (based on sold sales on the bay).</p><p><br /></p><p>There is a huge disparity between the obverse and the reverse, and in a way I wonder if the coin was a very late/near-end-of-die-life strike?</p><p><br /></p><p>I was going to start another thread about this, but this thread has seen a bit of traffic.</p><p><br /></p><p>Here&#039;s the rest of the coin;</p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>[ATTACH=full]1135063[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=full]1135064[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=full]1135065[/ATTACH][/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in