Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Lucius Verus/Mt. Argaeus: a reverse variety not listed in RPC Online?
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="zumbly, post: 4918805, member: 57495"]Great coin, with nice clear devices. I believe the deer is meant to be there, but is probably worn away on most examples. It was also what attracted me to the one I bought, which also shows a tree or plant on the right rock. Mine, however, is RPC 7030.</p><p><br /></p><p>[ATTACH=full]1185392[/ATTACH]<b>LUCIUS VERUS</b></p><p>AR Didrachm. 6.64g, 21.4mm. CAPPADOCIA, Caesarea, AD 161-166 (Cos 2). Metcalf 131d; RPC Online Vol. 4, #7030. O: AYTOKP OYHPOC CEBACTOC, draped and cuirassed bust right. R: YΠATOC B, Mt. Argaeus with two large rocks at its base, left rock decorated with a deer leaping left, right rock with a tree; in the middle, a round stippled rock (wreathed in flames or surrounded by water?); on summit, Helios standing left, holding globe and long sceptre. </p><p><br /></p><p>On mine, between the two large rocks at the base are two smaller round rocks flanking something else that does not appear to be just another small rock. I've no idea what it might be meant to depict. The entranceway of a shrine maybe? In any case, it certainly looks different compared to yours with the smaller stippled rock.</p><p><br /></p><p>The entry for RPC 7027 lists as examples Metcalf Hoard 694-718, but unfortunately only illustrates that one example that you show above. The ANS digital library has that Metcalf paper <a href="http://numismatics.org/digitallibrary/ark:/53695/nnan171384" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="http://numismatics.org/digitallibrary/ark:/53695/nnan171384" rel="nofollow">online</a>, including the plates that show those coins, but the image is so small that I can't make out the details clearly. From what I can tell, most do seem to have three objects like the illustrated example rather than one like on yours, but a few, 718 for example, <i>may</i> have just one object? The varieties listed on RPC seem to make a distinction based only on bust type and what surmounts the mountain, so I suspect more minor variations wouldn't qualify for a separate number. Still, I think it's worth submitting your coin to them to see what they say.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="zumbly, post: 4918805, member: 57495"]Great coin, with nice clear devices. I believe the deer is meant to be there, but is probably worn away on most examples. It was also what attracted me to the one I bought, which also shows a tree or plant on the right rock. Mine, however, is RPC 7030. [ATTACH=full]1185392[/ATTACH][B]LUCIUS VERUS[/B] AR Didrachm. 6.64g, 21.4mm. CAPPADOCIA, Caesarea, AD 161-166 (Cos 2). Metcalf 131d; RPC Online Vol. 4, #7030. O: AYTOKP OYHPOC CEBACTOC, draped and cuirassed bust right. R: YΠATOC B, Mt. Argaeus with two large rocks at its base, left rock decorated with a deer leaping left, right rock with a tree; in the middle, a round stippled rock (wreathed in flames or surrounded by water?); on summit, Helios standing left, holding globe and long sceptre. On mine, between the two large rocks at the base are two smaller round rocks flanking something else that does not appear to be just another small rock. I've no idea what it might be meant to depict. The entranceway of a shrine maybe? In any case, it certainly looks different compared to yours with the smaller stippled rock. The entry for RPC 7027 lists as examples Metcalf Hoard 694-718, but unfortunately only illustrates that one example that you show above. The ANS digital library has that Metcalf paper [URL='http://numismatics.org/digitallibrary/ark:/53695/nnan171384']online[/URL], including the plates that show those coins, but the image is so small that I can't make out the details clearly. From what I can tell, most do seem to have three objects like the illustrated example rather than one like on yours, but a few, 718 for example, [I]may[/I] have just one object? The varieties listed on RPC seem to make a distinction based only on bust type and what surmounts the mountain, so I suspect more minor variations wouldn't qualify for a separate number. Still, I think it's worth submitting your coin to them to see what they say.[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Lucius Verus/Mt. Argaeus: a reverse variety not listed in RPC Online?
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...