Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;lrbguy, post: 2942690, member: 88829&quot;]Thanks for looking and for the kind comments everyone.&nbsp; I suspect some of these will pop up from time to time. </p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>The <i>BMCRE</i> listings for Vitellius contain this notation between the Group I and Group II listings (p369): </p><p>&quot;Hybrids between Groups I and II.</p><p><i>Obv.</i> Bare head (I).&nbsp;&nbsp; GERMAN IMP.TR.P * (II)</p><p>Not in B.M.&quot; </p><p>with the footnote,</p><p>&quot; * The following <i>rev.</i> occurs with this <i>obv.</i> :&nbsp; (a) XV VIR SACR.FAC.&quot;</p><p><br /></p><p>I believe this note applies to my coin.&nbsp; There is no note or comment indicating whether these hybrids are proper for the issue or unauthorized, but normally hybrids are given separate listings after the main sections.&nbsp; This intrusion on the early listings is unusual.</p><p><br /></p><p>I went back to the original auction listing, and in their attribution they reference RICA<font size="1">2</font> 86 (the 2 is superscript referring to the revised edition I believe).&nbsp; I do not have the revised edition of RIC I.</p><p><br /></p><p>That&#039;s about all I can tell you.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in