Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;jay4202472000, post: 1984060, member: 42573&quot;]I like them all, but I am not sure the 1946-S is a clash.&nbsp; I&#039;ve found a ton of &#039;46-S Lincolns that show PIDT (progressive indirect design transfer).&nbsp; It resembles a clash, but no evidence shows on the obverse.&nbsp; The folks at ICG know more than me, but I swear &quot;ghosting&quot; is what it looks like to me.&nbsp; Either way they are all nice looking errors.&nbsp; I&#039;d love to own the &#039;45-S.&nbsp; Here&#039;s a link to PIDT:</p><p><br /></p><p><a href="http://www.error-ref.com/progressive-indirect-design-transfer/" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="http://www.error-ref.com/progressive-indirect-design-transfer/" rel="nofollow">http://www.error-ref.com/progressive-indirect-design-transfer/</a>[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in