Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Lot of 6 Romans
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="John Anthony, post: 1821040, member: 42773"]The last coin in this lot is another ant of Gallienus.</p><p><br /></p><p>6. Gallienus, c. 218-268</p><p>AR Atoninianus, 20mm, 3.9g, 6h; Antioch mint, 266-268</p><p>Obv.: GALLIENVS P F AVG; radiate and cuirassed bust right seen from front</p><p>Rev.: ROMAE AETERNAE, Roma seated left on shield, Victory in right, spear in left, star upper left</p><p>Reference: RIC 5(a) Gallienus Sole Rule 654 (p. 188)</p><p><br /></p><p>The coin is porous, but has good detail. Seller says it comes from the Antioch Hoard, and what I’ve read of the hoard seems to jibe with the piece. The coins were selected for their substantial (or apparently substantial) silver content, and generally don’t exhibit any wear. It’s conjectured that the collector lived near a mint. Coming so late in Gallienus’ reign, I don’t doubt that this is a washed billon issue, but the wash is quite homogenous.</p><p><br /></p><p>I find it odd that the first coin I posted and this one differ so widely, coming from the same period. Perhaps the Antioch mint had higher standards?</p><p><br /></p><p><a href="http://postimage.org/" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="http://postimage.org/" rel="nofollow"><img src="http://s21.postimg.org/um5xjhbmv/gallienus700.jpg" class="bbCodeImage wysiwygImage" alt="" unselectable="on" /></a>[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="John Anthony, post: 1821040, member: 42773"]The last coin in this lot is another ant of Gallienus. 6. Gallienus, c. 218-268 AR Atoninianus, 20mm, 3.9g, 6h; Antioch mint, 266-268 Obv.: GALLIENVS P F AVG; radiate and cuirassed bust right seen from front Rev.: ROMAE AETERNAE, Roma seated left on shield, Victory in right, spear in left, star upper left Reference: RIC 5(a) Gallienus Sole Rule 654 (p. 188) The coin is porous, but has good detail. Seller says it comes from the Antioch Hoard, and what I’ve read of the hoard seems to jibe with the piece. The coins were selected for their substantial (or apparently substantial) silver content, and generally don’t exhibit any wear. It’s conjectured that the collector lived near a mint. Coming so late in Gallienus’ reign, I don’t doubt that this is a washed billon issue, but the wash is quite homogenous. I find it odd that the first coin I posted and this one differ so widely, coming from the same period. Perhaps the Antioch mint had higher standards? [url=http://postimage.org/][img]http://s21.postimg.org/um5xjhbmv/gallienus700.jpg[/img][/url][/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Lot of 6 Romans
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...