Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;Richard M. Renneboog, post: 2996449, member: 89693&quot;]Well, I went through them. For anyone who is interested in distribution analysis, this is what I found:</p><p>1 @ 1920, 1928, 1929, 1930 and 1935</p><p>4 @ 1939</p><p>2 @ 1940</p><p>4 @ 1941</p><p>5 @ 1942, 1 @ 1942D</p><p>1 @ 1943</p><p>14 @ 1944, 1 @ 1944D, 1 @ 1944S</p><p>10 @ 1945, 1 @ 1945D, 1 @ 1945S</p><p>7 @ 1946, 4 @ 1946D</p><p>2 @ 1947, 1 @ 1947D</p><p>3 @ 1948</p><p>2 # 1950</p><p>5 @ 1951, 4 @ 1951D, 1 @ 1951S</p><p>5 @ 1952D, 1 @ 1952S</p><p>4 [USER=85158]@1953[/USER], 9 @ 1953D</p><p>4 @ 1954D</p><p>2 @ 1955, 4 @ 1955D</p><p>1 @ 1956, 8 @ 1956D</p><p>2 @ 1957, 5 @ 1957D</p><p>3 @ 1958, 2 @ 1958D</p><p>and</p><p>1 @ 1953 with the word &#039;MAX&#039; stamped on the back</p><p>Unfortunately, no 1955 DDOs were seen.</p><p>I guess it should be no surprise that they were almost all 1940s and 1950s, but I am a bit surprised at the number of 1944s, 1945s and 1953s relative to the overall.</p><p>They were all worn about what you would expect from being in circulation for about 20 years or more, but there were a few that looked pretty decent.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in