Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;ToughCOINS, post: 2049671, member: 20480&quot;]I think that, if you like coins with fewer marks, you might do better to buy a slightly better date in 62.</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>Why? . . . the 1926 &amp; 1932 are so intensely lustrous that they are always quite marky until you really climb into elevated grades.&nbsp; I think the TPGs tend to grade a bit less liberally with the better dates, so you generally end up with a cleaner looking coin in the same grade. </p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>You might pay slightly more money for a better date, but end up happier with the look for the money, instead of going the next grade with a common date 1932 or 1926.</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>If you&#039;re a luster maven, and don&#039;t care as much about marks, then the 1926 or 1932 is definitely the date to buy.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in