Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Looking for Help in Understanding Ancient Coins and Descriptions
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="dougsmit, post: 3454555, member: 19463"]Let's be clear about this. The vast majority of books on ancient coins (or anything, for that matter) are outdated to some degree. Our job as readers is to be able to ferret out the grams of precious metals from the kilograms of slag. We do not read any of the standard references with the kind of reverence that religious people treat their holy works. Sydenham was pretty well made useless by the publication of Crawford which is getting a little long in the tooth but has not been replaced with a better standard reference. RIC (Roman Imperial Coinage) was published in ten volumes over a wide span of years by several authors who did not agree with one another on how a book should be formatted. Several of the volumes have been updated/replaced so there are more recent versions but some of them are borderline hilarious. They are not worthless since many people still believe in the numbering system they put forth but as a catalog of what exists and details about mints, etc. they are not something to bet on for important decisions. </p><p><br /></p><p>We on Coin Talk are just like books. Some things we get right and some things .... not so much. Some things are just opinions but there are few facts not subject to review or refinement with new evidence from new hoards and reconsideration of things that just don't make sense from the traditional wisdom. </p><p><br /></p><p>This is not important to those of us who do this for fun. I have no use for people who have a need to make their name by proving some new revision but every respect for those who try to understand things that were glossed over by previous experts. </p><p><br /></p><p>I encourage everyone to read critically and avoid questioning things that you don't understand just to be fashionable. "I don't know" is a reasonable response and "I'm learning" is the mark of someone to respect. </p><p><br /></p><p>By the way, I am forgetting as fast as I am learning. I most definitely have opinions and it is your job to decide if you should listen to me or the people who take all this, and themselves, waaaay too seriously.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="dougsmit, post: 3454555, member: 19463"]Let's be clear about this. The vast majority of books on ancient coins (or anything, for that matter) are outdated to some degree. Our job as readers is to be able to ferret out the grams of precious metals from the kilograms of slag. We do not read any of the standard references with the kind of reverence that religious people treat their holy works. Sydenham was pretty well made useless by the publication of Crawford which is getting a little long in the tooth but has not been replaced with a better standard reference. RIC (Roman Imperial Coinage) was published in ten volumes over a wide span of years by several authors who did not agree with one another on how a book should be formatted. Several of the volumes have been updated/replaced so there are more recent versions but some of them are borderline hilarious. They are not worthless since many people still believe in the numbering system they put forth but as a catalog of what exists and details about mints, etc. they are not something to bet on for important decisions. We on Coin Talk are just like books. Some things we get right and some things .... not so much. Some things are just opinions but there are few facts not subject to review or refinement with new evidence from new hoards and reconsideration of things that just don't make sense from the traditional wisdom. This is not important to those of us who do this for fun. I have no use for people who have a need to make their name by proving some new revision but every respect for those who try to understand things that were glossed over by previous experts. I encourage everyone to read critically and avoid questioning things that you don't understand just to be fashionable. "I don't know" is a reasonable response and "I'm learning" is the mark of someone to respect. By the way, I am forgetting as fast as I am learning. I most definitely have opinions and it is your job to decide if you should listen to me or the people who take all this, and themselves, waaaay too seriously.[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Looking for Help in Understanding Ancient Coins and Descriptions
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...