Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;NOS, post: 1286820, member: 2098&quot;]For the love of God, has anybody besides myself actually read the text of the HPA or the posting that I made yesterday? Admittedly, I did not read what the law states until LindeDad posted a link to the stated language of the HPA. Randy got it mostly right except for the above quote but so many others on here seem to believe only what they want to believe and are not understanding what those of us with good English comprehension or sound critical thinking skills are attempting to convey.</p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>&quot;Per the quoted URL above, the exact words of the law are as follows:</p><p>Sec. 304.6 Marking requirements for imitation numismatic items.</p><p><br /></p><p>&quot;(a) An imitation numismatic item which is manufactured in the United States, or imported into the United States for introduction into or distribution in commerce, shall be plainly and permanently marked “COPY”.&quot;</p><p><br /></p><p>This stands out to me clear as day: &quot;for introduction into or distribution in commerce,...&quot; That says it all right there. Clearly, importing replicas for your own personal use and not spending them at a food store or distributing them without the word &quot;COPY&quot; is not illegal.&quot;</p><p><br /></p><p>That&#039;s what I said yesterday but it appears to have flown over the heads of so many on here, I find that to be disturbing...[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in