Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;OldSilverDollar, post: 7656350, member: 119784&quot;]ANACS &amp; ICG are not 2nd tier I disagree all four companies have well educated &amp; trained graders...what those 2 companies fail to realize after all these years from thousands of remarks online given as feedback by customers they still will not &quot;modernize&quot; the holders. the thing the majority care about. the holder is the show piece of the coin.</p><p><br /></p><p><b>ANACS</b> regarding that <b><i>yellow label</i> </b>that many do not like. almost every thing i have seen points to people wanting a <b>modern soapbox holder</b>. they loved the style and size of those old white ones.</p><p><br /></p><p><b>ICG</b> the lack of a nice <i>White/Gold or White/Silver label </i>and <i>just label options in general</i> has hurt them. they need to look at the holder, look at the type of plastic and get rid of the rough sealant around the holders edge, update the QC on the holders and make them more scratch resistant with a more premium feel. it&#039;s a nice design but needs a haircut.</p><p><br /></p><p>My point is for the average collector our only experiences with the <b>TPG</b> is the holders and how it looks in the collection. an ugly/outdated holder or no label options with only an ugly green/yellow label help push the inferiority narrative the big duopoly likes to spotlight to make them look better and convince collectors ANAC/ICG as inferior .</p><p><br /></p><p>Just my two cents.<img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie73" alt=":phantom:" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" />[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in