Little gem a lunch time find

Discussion in 'Coin Chat' started by Lawtoad, Feb 1, 2019.

  1. Lawtoad

    Lawtoad Well-Known Member

    20190201_115910.jpg 20190201_115923.jpg 20190201_115933.jpg 20190201_120426.jpg Stopped at grocery store over lunch. Used self check out and out of the change chute came this little gem. It was with a few other new Lincons so I did not see it at first. It is a proof 1969-S Lincoln (impaired proof now). Tried to get photos with my phone but not the best. The mirrored fields are still there.

    20190201_115910.jpg
     
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. Lawtoad

    Lawtoad Well-Known Member

    Another photo. Tried to capture the mirrored fields.

    20190201_121603.jpg
     
  4. Lawtoad

    Lawtoad Well-Known Member

    A couple of straight on pictures.

    20190201_122633.jpg 20190201_122723.jpg
     
  5. 1916D10C

    1916D10C Key Date Mercs are Life! 1916-D/1921-D/1921

    I don't mean to rain on your parade, but I don't think that's a proof. However, a fairly high grade for a coin of it's age!
     
  6. rickmp

    rickmp Frequently flatulent.

    Agreed.
     
  7. alurid

    alurid Well-Known Member

    I'm not seeing a square edge all the way around it, and a bit of a misaligned die strike on both sides.
     
  8. Treashunt

    Treashunt The Other Frank

    ditto
     
  9. Lawtoad

    Lawtoad Well-Known Member

    It may very well be a nice business strike. I don't have pride when it comes to coins. In hand the fields are mirror like in spots. Either way it is a nice little find. In re-looking at the edge it is not as square as it should be.
     
    1916D10C likes this.
  10. 1916D10C

    1916D10C Key Date Mercs are Life! 1916-D/1921-D/1921

    It sure is my man. As I said, not knocking your find by any means.
     
    Lawtoad likes this.
  11. Lawtoad

    Lawtoad Well-Known Member

    I did not take it as you knocking the find at all. I added to my last response that the edge, on second look, does not look as square as it should be. Since 1969-S was not a proof only issue, it is very much more likely a nice business strike someone separated from a mint set fairly recently.
     
    1916D10C likes this.
  12. alurid

    alurid Well-Known Member

    Is that a tiny die chip on the 9?
     
  13. paddyman98

    paddyman98 I'm a professional expert in specializing! Supporter

    A business strike Cent weighs 3.11 grams..
    A Proof Cent would weigh double at 6.22 grams because it is specially struck twice..






    Just kidding :wacky:
    I always wanted to say that :hilarious:
     
    coin roll, Evan8, Inspector43 and 2 others like this.
  14. Randy Abercrombie

    Randy Abercrombie Supporter! Supporter

    I almost thought for one second that I was going to get to correct you @paddyman98 ... Good one.. lol
     
    Inspector43, Numiser and paddyman98 like this.
  15. Inspector43

    Inspector43 Celebrating 75 Years Active Collecting Supporter

    @paddyman98 Now you know how many newcomers only read half of what you write. You've implied it many times. You just sent a lot of people to get their scales. But, I love it. Thanks for a little fun in the day.
     
    Randy Abercrombie and paddyman98 like this.
  16. Evan8

    Evan8 A Little Off Center

    You literally had me reaching for my red book for a second.
     
    1916D10C, coin roll and paddyman98 like this.
  17. coin roll

    coin roll Active Member

    If you read it twice does it make the Proof weigh 12.44 grams?
     
  18. desertgem

    desertgem Senior Errer Collecktor

    If you flip it in the air , it oxidizes faster,








    :angelic:
     
    rickmp likes this.
  19. Lawtoad

    Lawtoad Well-Known Member

    Not a die chip. Under the loop it actually looks like a ding it took from another coin. The contact moved a tiny bit of metal.
     
    alurid likes this.
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page