Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;John Burgess, post: 8255021, member: 105098&quot;]Hi PamR.</p><p><br /></p><p>Look, to add some clarity to the whole WAM vs. CAM thing, the mint made 8 reverse types over the memorial cent series, listed here:</p><p><a href="http://varietyvista.com/01b%20LC%20Doubled%20Dies%20Vol%202/Memorial%20Reverse%20Design%20Varieties.htm" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="http://varietyvista.com/01b%20LC%20Doubled%20Dies%20Vol%202/Memorial%20Reverse%20Design%20Varieties.htm" rel="nofollow">http://varietyvista.com/01b LC Doubled Dies Vol 2/Memorial Reverse Design Varieties.htm</a></p><p><br /></p><p>the 1992 is supposed to be RDV-006. Some were Struck with RDV-007, the &quot;close AM&quot; reverse.</p><p><br /></p><p>in 1998-1999-2000, the cents were supposed to be struck with RDV-007, instead they were struck with RDV-006. </p><p><br /></p><p>Why this happened for the 1998-1999-2000? Because they were using RDV-006 for the S mint proof cents and got the dies mixed up at philly, it&#039;s also why there are CAM (RDV-006) proof cents in 1998 and 1999 that were supposed to be WAM (RDV-007), shipped some wrong dies to San Fran. </p><p><br /></p><p>Hopefully this explains and clarifies what they are, and how they came to be. </p><p><br /></p><p>the 1992 was a transitional year, and they transitioned to the new dies of the following year somehow early in a limited quantity. so there are 1992 CAM (RDV-007).</p><p><br /></p><p>take a look at the page linked, and hopefully it triggers the &quot;aha! moment&quot;. <img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie1" alt=":)" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" /></p><p>best of luck to you![/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in