Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Error Coins
>
Lincoln Small Dates: a Overview and Visual Analysis.
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="jcuve, post: 731058, member: 13945"]<b>A not on prices</b></p><p><br /></p><p><font face="Arial"><b>A not on prices:</b></font></p><p><br /></p><p><font face="Arial">While in all cases, probably just by chance, the Small Dates (SD) tend to be rare, scarce or a little harder to find than Large Dates (LD) – only the 1970S SD business strikes, proofs, and a nice proof example of the 1960P SD command a noticeable premium. </font></p><p><br /></p><p><font face="Arial">The PCGS price guide, while not a good indicator of the value of a coin in hand, lists the 1960P and 1960D in MS-65RD as $5 and $2 higher respectively over LDs in the same condition – which isn’t much. </font></p><p><br /></p><p><font face="Arial">The 1970S SDs can be found for less than $100 raw, and again, most of the ones on eBay are actually LDs erroneously listed as SDs. </font></p><p><br /></p><p><font face="Arial">The 1974 SDs are less common than LDs but easily found and most collectors seem to ignore them (…maybe if albums created spots there would be more interest?). Take note there are two styles of S mintmark for the San Francisco business strikes. </font></p><p><br /></p><p><font face="Arial">The 1982 SD Lincolns, both clad and copper issues, are scarcer but still findable and really only worth more in a full BU roll. </font></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><font face="Arial">...And thanks for the positive comments! <img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie1" alt=":)" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" /></font>[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="jcuve, post: 731058, member: 13945"][b]A not on prices[/b] [FONT=Arial][B]A not on prices:[/B][/FONT] [FONT=Arial] [/FONT] [FONT=Arial]While in all cases, probably just by chance, the Small Dates (SD) tend to be rare, scarce or a little harder to find than Large Dates (LD) – only the 1970S SD business strikes, proofs, and a nice proof example of the 1960P SD command a noticeable premium. [/FONT] [FONT=Arial] [/FONT] [FONT=Arial]The PCGS price guide, while not a good indicator of the value of a coin in hand, lists the 1960P and 1960D in MS-65RD as $5 and $2 higher respectively over LDs in the same condition – which isn’t much. [/FONT] [FONT=Arial] [/FONT] [FONT=Arial]The 1970S SDs can be found for less than $100 raw, and again, most of the ones on eBay are actually LDs erroneously listed as SDs. [/FONT] [FONT=Arial] [/FONT] [FONT=Arial]The 1974 SDs are less common than LDs but easily found and most collectors seem to ignore them (…maybe if albums created spots there would be more interest?). Take note there are two styles of S mintmark for the San Francisco business strikes. [/FONT] [FONT=Arial] [/FONT] [FONT=Arial]The 1982 SD Lincolns, both clad and copper issues, are scarcer but still findable and really only worth more in a full BU roll. [/FONT] [FONT=Arial][/FONT] [FONT=Arial][/FONT] [FONT=Arial]...And thanks for the positive comments! :)[/FONT][/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Error Coins
>
Lincoln Small Dates: a Overview and Visual Analysis.
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...