Lincoln Cent "error" what type?

Discussion in 'Error Coins' started by Coinattic_Hunter69 S, Oct 12, 2015.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. pennsteve

    pennsteve Well-Known Member

    Teachmind is back. The "in due time" gave it away. Well, everything about his post gave it away.
     
    paddyman98 and rickmp like this.
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. KurtS

    KurtS Die variety collector

    I will accept no less for my exceedingly rare error: ;)
    [​IMG]
     
    Last edited: Oct 12, 2015
    Sullysullinburg likes this.
  4. Hommer

    Hommer Curator of Semi Precious Coinage

    Would that be considered counterfeit or altered?
     
  5. KurtS

    KurtS Die variety collector

    I demonstrated it is nothing more than damage. :)
     
  6. tomfiggy

    tomfiggy Well-Known Member

    did you just commit a felony with that file?
     
    Lisa1980 likes this.
  7. KurtS

    KurtS Die variety collector

    You're welcome to report it to the Secret Service or Treasury :rolleyes::depressed::cyclops:
     
    tomfiggy likes this.
  8. Treashunt

    Treashunt The Other Frank

    put it on eBay!

    It is priceless!

    Happy?
     
    phankins11 likes this.
  9. phankins11

    phankins11 Well-Known Member

    3 hours and 20 minutes later......crickets
     
    KurtS and Hommer like this.
  10. Coinattic_Hunter69 S

    Coinattic_Hunter69 S Full Fledged Optimist

    Observe, photo 1 shows coin with "error" on right note the difference...

    Observe, photo 2 show you all "error" on coin is not do to claims some infamous "Grind Theory" note See'' metal over laps @ 3:00 on the edge of rim total opposite of some "Grind Theory" I advise to all when coin are being suggested under the assumptions of the "Grind Theory" research then disregard they are amateurs most likely the claim has no weight..

    Observe, Photo 3 weight is correct thus proving photo 1 and 2 posed against "Grind Theory" now 100% proved wrong.

    The "Grind Theory" is most thought of by the unknowing lack of knowledge pessimistic type collector's they based on assumptions and confirm without research. I advise and warn all research carefully your precious metals have an idea of what you have if not you may be mislead...
     

    Attached Files:

    Last edited: Oct 13, 2015
  11. Coinattic_Hunter69 S

    Coinattic_Hunter69 S Full Fledged Optimist

    Hater's are like crickets... They make a lot of noise but when you walk by... They're quiet. Smh???
     
  12. desertgem

    desertgem Senior Errer Collecktor Supporter

    Actually you are misleading and you fall into the "assumption based group..." as your statement

    has 2 things assumed. One is that your scale is accurate enough to weigh 2.60 grams accurately as I see yours only weigh to 0.1 grams, so the last digit is an estimate that is rounded off to the nearest .1 gram. The second thing is that the 2.60 grams is an exact weight of all clad cents, whereas it is 2.5 +/- 0.1 gram, or 2.40grams to 2.60grams. A coin that was 2.60 and ground down to 2.55 would still read 2.6 on your scale due to rounding.

    I gave you the benefit of doubt that you calibrated your scale with a clean calibration weight before you weighted the coin.
     
    ldhair and KurtS like this.
  13. Coinattic_Hunter69 S

    Coinattic_Hunter69 S Full Fledged Optimist

    Honestly, I will agree with you on the account of your experience and status quo and mathematically you're correct .. I factor the weight @ 2.5 before taking the shot I' was surprise it posed 2.6 after I didnt think to much of it may be I should next time, wel because my scale it's fairly accurate every now n then sometimes it will 1 digit up/down back to correct weight eventually. That being mentioned there is still photo 1 and 2 photo 2 is strong enough to support my claim the photo taken is visible and clear there is an over lap at the edge of the rim @ 3:00 it can be seen clearly surely the more plausible answer here is an "error" what looks to have been grind actually wasn't but molted or shifted to edge of the rim totally opposite the picture clearly show this. Granted, that it was grind the weight would have drop at the very least one gram easy thus being 2.4 may be less but the weight remains rounding up by .1 gram which is not unusual its a 1989 Lincoln memorial, weight 2.5 enough to rule "error" as for alter the possibilities of that has weakened greatly provided the pictures I put out the evidence for alter to me has all been relinquished... Beside's what meets the eye.
     
    Last edited: Oct 13, 2015
  14. 19Lyds

    19Lyds Member of the United States of Confusion

    That would be referred to as the "Leave Me in the Road" error in combination with the "Slide Me on the Sidewalk" error.
     
    jay4202472000 and KurtS like this.
  15. 19Lyds

    19Lyds Member of the United States of Confusion

    Uhhhh, then why'd you ask?? HMMMMM.gif
     
  16. Coinattic_Hunter69 S

    Coinattic_Hunter69 S Full Fledged Optimist

    Fine with me... Haha, its not my favorite but its error I keep it just to have it..
     
  17. Coinattic_Hunter69 S

    Coinattic_Hunter69 S Full Fledged Optimist

  18. 19Lyds

    19Lyds Member of the United States of Confusion

    You descriptions must give you a headache because they make me dizzy trying to follow what you are attempting to say.

    I'm thinking that you are simply one of many thousands of folks out there that believe that they have ALL the answers without even knowing the questions.

    You see something "different" and then feebly attempt to justify it as some type of an error.

    I need to tell you that NOTHING in the minting process would produce what you are looking at. Nothing.

    I also need to tell you that your coin has been altered and since that level of grinding would not eliminate as much metal as you would like to believe, the coin weighs well within tolerance.

    My suggestion is that you give this folly up and perhaps consider going into the Technical Editing Field.
     
  19. 19Lyds

    19Lyds Member of the United States of Confusion

    Given your responses, it appears that you think you already knew.

    Maybe you were just trying to trip folks up which would put you directly into the "Troll" category of posters?
     
  20. Coinattic_Hunter69 S

    Coinattic_Hunter69 S Full Fledged Optimist

    You got issues... I know your kind, dime a dozen weirdo's neh, your just a typical hater. Move on already take a break here soon from now Im bringing back the double 1969's I doubt you want to be around when that happens... lol
     
  21. Coinattic_Hunter69 S

    Coinattic_Hunter69 S Full Fledged Optimist

    SERIOUSLY, dude where you getting all this info from? Your assumptions? I've lost all respect for you.. You're no longer acknowledge leave me alone you got some nerves attacking me with nothing but mere assumption your own imaginations... Crazy, come at me with supporting facts and I'll prove you wrong too... You think Im just going to believe "YOU" really..... Think about it BoB you are telling me to throw all my coins away... GET OFF PAGE.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page