Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;Morgandude11, post: 2014553, member: 37839&quot;]See, but your mind regarding the issue of grading isn&#039;t the important one, with all due respect.&nbsp; Whatever one wishes to call it, that is a key date gem Morgan-- surely one of the very best in the opinion of those who matter in transactions of coins such as this:&nbsp; the high end collectors are the ones who care, and need to care.&nbsp; The article is quite correct about the frequency of Morgan contact marks, and that they are often secondary to the quality of the surfaces, luster, color, and other tangibles.</p><p><br /></p><p>Doug, I can&#039;t even seriously address your comments, when you grade EVERY coin in the realm 1-3 grades lower than reality dictates.&nbsp; That is just plain wrong, shows a lack of sensitivity to the hobby ( irrespective of your experiences).[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in