Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;dougsmit, post: 2868983, member: 19463&quot;]Technically speaking the number is 264L<b><u>I</u></b>&nbsp; not L1.&nbsp; LI stands for <b>L</b>icinius <b>I</b>.&nbsp; 264 was a single ruler type but if it had been issued for Licinius Junior the number would have been 264LII.&nbsp; Tory was not consistent in his name codes. Constantine the great was CI using the Roman numeral as did Licinius but Maximinus II was M2 and Maxentius was M3.&nbsp; If you are not confused yet Maximianus was just M, Constantius was C and Galerius was G with no numbers.&nbsp; Constantius II was CS.&nbsp; Tory marched to his own drummer.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in